The Pentax K-x broke new ground by being made available in Japan in a broad spectrum of body colors. Until now, U.S. K-x's were available in black, white, red, and navy blue—more colors than most cameras come in, but far short of what's available in Japan. The colors have been a surprisingly popular option both there and here, however, so Pentax USA is now importing four more color options—I guess I don't have to write this in English, assuming you can see the picture above, but the new colors are green, orange, purple, and bright blue.
The new colors are available exclusively (for the time being, anyway) at the Pentax webstore, sold with the compact 18–55mm kit lens for the nice price of $649.95.
The K-x has been a very good seller, even to Pentax aficionados who also have higher-end DSLRs.
Mike
Send this post to a friend
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2010 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
The red K-x convinced my wife to set aside her venerable AE-1 and Tri-X and "try this digital photography thing." She said it wasn't the color that attracted her, but that I have a bag full of K-mount primes she can borrow.
Ah, but once I saw how well that little eye-catcher handled low light, she's had to borrow the body and the lenses! There is a lot more to like about these little Pentaxes than just their candy-colored shells...
Posted by: MarkB | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 11:13 AM
Alas, they don't seem to be available in Europe - and I do lust for a blue K-x.
Posted by: juze | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 11:29 AM
Not exactly a street photographers dream.
Posted by: Tom K. | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 11:54 AM
Designed for the discerning professional, who wants that extra edge. Impress your friends. You'll really stand out with these cameras at the next press conference.
Posted by: K.Kafka | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 11:54 AM
Those must be the ugliest cameras I've ever seen! those are just loud... remind me of kids candies, or popsicles..? I know this is cheaper than getting me my DA 28mm f2, but still... I guess the "Now and Late" colored camera sells for pentax.
Posted by: russel | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 12:09 PM
Be still my beating heart...
Posted by: Tom Clifton | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 12:14 PM
Heaven help us...
Posted by: Rob Atkins | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 12:31 PM
Wow - that's eye-catching. I had considered getting a K-x as a second body. Would make a great compact package with the pancake lenses..... but how could I ever decide on the colour.....
Posted by: Richard | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 12:47 PM
Oh my god! What fantastic cameras! [g]
Posted by: Frank | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 12:49 PM
Sheesh, Mike, you'll never get anywhere by using such bland names for colours.
Let's call them Nerf Green, Orange Burst, Turnip (or possibly Dark Orchid), and Pale Nanking Blue. :)
Posted by: erlik | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 01:06 PM
Very 1970s Porsche colors! I think those would be Viper Green, Signal Orange, Aubergine, and Albert Blue if they were 911s
Posted by: hugh crawford | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 01:06 PM
Traditionalists may recoil in horror, but even a confirmed street-shooter like me will acknowledge that few subjects would be intimidated by the sight of a photographer wielding a bright green Pentax Kx with kit lens attached. If anything, you'd have trouble getting photos where your subjects didn't have an amused and somewhat questioning expression on their faces.
Posted by: Gordon Lewis | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 01:42 PM
I like "Pale Nanking Blue." [g]
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 02:04 PM
neon green hasselblad h4d... now THAT would be something I'd like to see.
Posted by: Marcin Wajda | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 02:17 PM
As Lou Reed said "Linger on...your pale Nanking blue eyes". I've taken my daughter's apocalyptic red k-x out a few times and always get very positive and inquisitive comments from people.
Posted by: Bob B | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 02:35 PM
I don't mind the colors, but since I already have a Pentax mount 18-55 lens from my 6 megapixel camera, do I really need another one? Why not colors in body only sales?
Posted by: Al Patterson | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 02:53 PM
As far as I'm concerned, people can have whatever color they like. But what these 'far-out' releases from the manufacturers tends to conceal is the total lack of imagination in designing a new-looking DSLR.
Why do they still look like this? Most of the designs are not even ergonomic.
Posted by: mani | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 02:58 PM
I keep hoping they will bring the yellow one over from Japan...
I want a "Hasselblad Yellow" Pentax!
Posted by: David W. Scott | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 03:12 PM
Early on in its offering I succumbed to buying the white K-x shortly after having bought a K7 and the set of DA Limiteds. I have to admit the decision was based on its diminutive size and, yes, its color. I still shoot Canon professionally, but have not regretted my dalliance with Pentax. The K-x, in spite of discussions around cosmetics is a very capable and enjoyable tool for casual work.
Posted by: Gary Wilson | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 03:36 PM
The orange one should work especially well for street photography. No way anyone would know you were holding a camera!
--Marc
Posted by: Marc Rochkind | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 03:55 PM
Wow ... memories of the second iMac product line. You could get the computer in red, yellow, green, blue and purple. As for the first iMac, I'll twist the old cliche about Model T Fords and Bell telephones - you could have it in any color you wanted, as long as that color was Bondi blue.
Posted by: Carl Blesch | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 03:58 PM
Hmmm. I think I prefer the "classic black" - it's ever so slimming on a D300 with 70-200 2.8 lens.
However - would a white camera body absorb less solar energy, thus keeping the innards cooler? Or doesn't the shell color have enough of an impact to make a difference?
Not my cup of tea...but anything that garners new photographers into the hobby/art/mailing list is O.K. by me. Maybe those youngbloods just coming up will find the colors appealing?
Posted by: Jim Hart | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 04:04 PM
I agree with Gordon Lewis' comment. While the colors are hardly discreet, the "toy in primary colors" look of the K-x provides excellent camouflage in many urban environments. At a glance, few would take it seriously.
On a different note, if I am not mistaken, didn't Pentax implement the colors to attract younger buyers who have other electronic devices (iPods, cell phones) in similar colors, and women? Japanese magazine stores now carry magazines that specifically target young women--a large demographic with money to spend on such things. Not to put a strong gendered spin on the discussion, but for some markets such as the one in Japan, the multi-color move makes sense. I would not be surprised if the same appeal carries over to China, Korea, Singapore, and other south east Asian countries.
Posted by: Alex Vesey | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 06:11 PM
Mike remember your one camera one lens challenge? It's your fault I'm the new owner of an M6 classic. After viewing the above cameras I now know that I made the right decision. God save us from plastic cameras.
Posted by: MJFerron | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 07:12 PM
@erlik: there is reason why people pay pr so mcuh. The color after you 'correct' their name seems appealing. Orange burst. Wow!
Posted by: Dennis Ng | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 08:24 PM
Hasselblad, no less, did this in the 90's -- yellow, red, blue and green 501cm's, as I remember. Pentax are just a bunch of copycats. The colored Hasselblad command premium prices on the used market.
Posted by: Robert Meier | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 08:35 PM
Wow...some really mixed reactions in the comments.
Just to throw my hat in the ring - I like them.
I don't know that I'd ever buy one, but I think it's an overall good thing for photography in general.
This could bring in younger photographers to the fold, and the youth is full of excitement and raw vision.
I do actually like the white one BTW.
Posted by: Damien Franco | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 10:20 PM
Damien,
That's my take too. I don't need colors myself, but it seems like fun and I can't see any harm in it. Apparently some people really do like the colors, and more power to 'em.
Besides, from what I'm hearing, people come for the colors but then also really do like the camera.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 10:28 PM
While they are bright colors, I don't find them any crazier than the different color vulcanite replacements people throw on their Leica's and the likes.
Posted by: Chris | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 11:40 PM
Interesting responses. I talked to my students about these colored Kx cameras today. Their reaction was immediate acceptance and interest in the concept.
Most of them have multi-colored phones and music players. This concept fits in nicely with the other electronics they purchase. Pentax is smart to do this. And if it helps them sell more cameras, why would we care or belittle them?
It is good for Pentax -- the more sales the better -- and if someone does not like the idea of colors, they can buy a black one.
Or maybe Pentax can go way out on a limb and make a camera with a top deck colored silver, with the rest of the camera in black. Naah - who would buy a camera like that?
Posted by: Dave Karp | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 11:45 PM
I'm holding out for Shy Retiring Grey (you Yanks will get the Gray variant, I assume).
Posted by: James McDermott | Monday, 26 April 2010 at 11:47 PM
If I had the cash I'd spring for the blue one in a flat second -- with the 31 limited. It would make a lovely contrast to my black M6, it would have much better low light performance, and in low light it would look dark grey, anyway.
Posted by: Spiny Norman | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 12:48 AM
Colour names are really just PR. For instance, on that page with Pale Nanking Blue... What they call Chinese Turquoise is called Pale Turquoise elsewhere. Their Deep Nanking Blue is called Royal Blue elsewhere. Et cetera, et cetera.
Concerning demographics: yes, it's apparently proven that women see more colours than men. that may be the reason for all those Aureolins and Pale Pears. OTOH, I wonder what average results would women have on the Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue test. Or on that even harder one, which I can't find at the moment, where you have to arrange colours not in rows but in spiralled hexagons.
Posted by: erlik | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 01:09 AM
To hell with stealth! Try getting a natural pose with that torch pointed towards someones face...
Posted by: Svein-Frode | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 01:11 AM
Do they squirt water?
Posted by: David Bennett | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 02:32 AM
I think I'll get one in each color. Then I can match the color to my mood. Cool.
Posted by: Bill Rogers | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 05:21 AM
This reminds me a bit of what I see in camera coverings. The various brightly dyed snake and lizard replacement coverings have a small but steady appeal to the classic camera crowd.
Posted by: john robison | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 05:37 AM
On one side of the fence people are taping up their black cameras to make them even less conspicuous, and on the other side we get this. As they say, different strokes...
If Pentax was really smart they'd make the colored bits detachable so people could "skin" their cameras to go with their mood or their wardrobe. After-market sales!
Posted by: Ed Hawco | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 07:33 AM
I don't dislike them :)
I guess these cameras are rather bold statements of lifestyle and geek-hood, while maintaining their quality and not turning into toys. They have a very selfimage-aware target, most probably not the same as TOP's audience. This target happens to be also quite quality-aware!
And I do subscribe to the view that it doesn't expose you to much in street photography, since people won't really take you seriously. Yet, go with a Canon 5D and and a huge L-glass to the streets and I'm quite sure what the effect would be.
Posted by: buligas | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 08:17 AM
"Not exactly a street photographers dream."
Personally, I think it is. Instead of some big, black hulking piece, here's something that's obviously some amateur's (sarcasm) camera. And the person you're photographing pays you no mind.
I think it's a great way to remain discreet. People just think you're shooting with a toy so obviously you're harmless. And the camera is a heck of a performer, by most accounts.
It's the reason I bought the Blue EPL-1, or I grabbed the silver version of the 28-80 Nikon Zoom (not to mention it's often cheaper) for my DSLR.
If anyone asks, it's often asking if I'm shooting a community college photo class project (with some cheap camera), or I get compliments asking about the color..."how cute!" Every time, I've been approached as if I were an amateur or not serious.
Nonthreatening.
Just the way I like it.
Posted by: Jason Orth | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 09:22 AM
. . In other news today: The Hoya Corporation - maker of Pentax cameras - announced that it has been purchased by Mars, Incorporated - maker of the ever popular and colorful M&M's candy ... .
Posted by: Cw. | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 09:29 AM
"Instead of some big, black hulking piece, here's something that's obviously some amateur's (sarcasm) camera. And the person you're photographing pays you no mind. I think it's a great way to remain discreet. People just think you're shooting with a toy so obviously you're harmless."
I think you're right, Jason. A long time ago I remember talking to a street photographer who used a big smiley-face sticker on the front of his camera. He said it made people ignore him, because they assumed he couldn't possibly be serious.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 09:40 AM
They're missing a trick here. If they're starting to sell multi-colour (or color, even) cameras in America, why haven't they done a Stars and Stripes version?
Would sell like hot cakes, surely?
Posted by: Antony Shepherd | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 09:45 AM
I seem to remember a series of personal computers that came in lollipop colors. They sold like hot-cakes* and saved a company.
This is assuming hot-cakes sell at a rate of 800,000 in the first five months.
Posted by: Chad Thompson | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 11:25 AM
I really like the colors. I agree with all those who said that the "toy" look will make it easier to do street photography - it is definitely much easier to get people to feel at ease next to you when they don't take you seriously. As long as I get a good shot, I really don't care if I'm treated as a child with a bright toy, because at the end of the day I know I'm walking home with a great photo.
Which is actually my only concern with this camera. I wonder how well it really performs under low light conditions, and, most importantly, how quiet is it?
Posted by: Yanita | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 01:22 PM
Does this mean that Pentax is running out of ideas?
Posted by: Player | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 01:35 PM
Two words ... Fisher-Price
Posted by: Brian W | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 03:55 PM
Mike,
When I was thinking of buying a Panasonic GF1, I considered the red-bodied version.
I was planning a trip to India and I reasoned that people might respond more positively if the camera communicated a lighthearted message via a red body.
In the end I didn't buy a GF1 but I think there is something in what I thought.
So as a candid street camera, the Pentax might not be a sensible choice, but as a camera with which to approach people for a portrait shot, - yes it might be good idea.
There is one proviso to this - I think the particular colors (at least as they show in the image in your post) of the bodies of these Pentaxes are awful.
Posted by: David Bennett | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 07:04 PM
I thought the most exciting thing in the press release was the Art Filter set: "Smith", "Winogrand", "Mapplethorpe", "Adams" and several others.
Posted by: Scott | Wednesday, 28 April 2010 at 12:48 PM
Colours aside I love my K-x. It is a dream in low light and I now use it for roughly 80% of my paid work (I shoot weddings, events etc in the main) Was shooting a dinner on Wednesday and couldn't help but think that if someone had told me 3 years ago that I could get a camera of this size and price that could shoot ISO 4500 so very respectably I would not have believed them. A real winner of a camera IMHO and if Pentax would only start making a cheap autofocus 50m f/1.8 again I would not hesitate in recommending it to anyone interested in natural light photography as a first camera.
Mine is black BTW. I am ever so boring....
Posted by: Edhombre | Friday, 30 April 2010 at 09:19 AM
@Yanita... it's great in low light. Shutter noise is not amazingly quiet or cultured though but is not too intrusive (to my ears at least) nowhere near as nice as the K7d or a 5d etc though.
Here's an example at iso 6400, some camera shake. Processed in Lightroom from raw, no other NR. Was lucky with how the light and the sensor interacted to be honest as normally I don't go above 4500 unless I have to but this one in particular looks pretty great to me.
You can view full size on flickr here if you feel the need to pixel peep at the movement blur... lots of other examples at high iso as well.
Posted by: Edhombre | Friday, 30 April 2010 at 09:52 AM