By Carl Weese
The Pike Drive-in, Montgomery, Pennsylvania, 2001
For years I’ve been working on a project dealing with The American Drive-in Theater. This is a pivotal picture in the series. I had made pictures of two drive-in theaters before I found this one, and they seemed to resonate with viewers. I was in Pennsylvania in late October of 2001 to photograph the odd juxtapositions of Halloween decorations and the enormous number of American flags displayed in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.
This time, I worked with the subject for a while, without getting what I wanted in late afternoon light. But I became so fascinated that I changed my travel plans and found a cheap room nearby, in Williamsport, Pennsylvania. First thing the next morning I drove back and made this picture, and quite a few others, with my 8x10 and 7x17 cameras. I knew exactly where I wanted the camera from studying the scene the evening before. I set up the 8x10 with my usual 240mm lens and used a considerable amount of front rise to get the framing I wanted. Then it was a matter of waiting for the sun rising behind the camera position to burn off just enough fog to give some dramatic light on the screens while the surrounding hills were still draped in mist.
By the time the fog burned off and the morning light turned harsh I was sure I had good pictures, and also that I wanted to turn the subject into a major project. At this point I’ve visited more than a hundred theaters in twenty-seven states, both operating theaters and derelicts, and made pictures of more than half of those.
The Pike Theater was mothballed for a while, but is now restored and operating through the season.
-
The Bon-Aire Motel, Williamstown, Ohio, 2003
I was spending a week doing a series of pictures at two drive-in theaters, one in Ohio and the other in Indiana. I spotted this boarded up motel on a very dry, dusty late afternoon driving between the two theaters. My notes show I thought it would make a good subject to come back to the next day if, as forecast, there was rain overnight. There was, and when I got to the motel it was still drizzling a bit. At first I made a few pictures with a Leica, working with the "truckers welcome" sign and passing truck traffic on the state highway. But when I wandered around to the east side of the complex and found this view I immediately saw it as an 8x10. So back to the truck, drive around to this spot, and set up the Deardorff with 240mm lens. The framing needed a little bit of front rise, and since the subject moves quite steeply back from the right to the left of the picture field I used a little bit of front swing and a touch of forward tilt to help focus. The overcast light was quite bright and as I recall I used an exposure of one second at my usual ƒ/45 aperture setting, with Ilford HP5 Plus film. There was some gusty wind and I hoped it would put a bit of action into the frame. When I finally got to "chimp" the wet negative in my darkroom a couple weeks later, I was delighted to see just the bit of movement in the leaves that I'd hoped for.
-
Rock in Stream, Steep Rock Reservation, 1998
This is a very simple picture that I like a lot. I tend most of the time to make much more complex pictures, but this one is a keeper. I first set up the Deardorff with a longer than normal 14-inch Kodak Commercial Ektar lens, but the picture space looked too flat. I switched to a 240mm Rodenstock Apo-Sironar S, which is by far my most frequently used lens for 8x10. I had to set the tripod very low and aim the camera steeply downward. Then I tilted the camera back strongly to the rear, which brought the focus plain parallel to the surface of the water and also enlarged the "drawing" of the foreground water patterns and submerged rocks. That meant I only needed to stop the lens down far enough keep the top of the rock, as well as the water, sharp. That, in turn, meant I could use a fairly fast shutter speed. I wanted to capture the patterns of the moving water with just a little bit of motion blur. I didn’t want a long exposure that would show the water fully blurred and foamy. I don’t usually record my exposures, but this was probably somewhere around 1/8th of a second at ƒ/22, on Tri-X.
Carl
Send this post to a friend
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Original contents copyright 2010 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved.
I seem to always be fascinated to read this kind of description of how, both technically and otherwise, a picture came to happen. Thanks for sharing ths with us!
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 09:13 AM
Thanks for the descriptions Carl...I really enjoy seeing a bit of the process like this. Wish I could have bought all three, but one will have to do. Interesting that the drive-in is now operating - since the picture looks like a long defunct place, never to be used that way again.
Posted by: David Bostedo | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 09:48 AM
Pyro developed?
Posted by: Helcio J. Tagliolatto | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 11:50 AM
Carl, have you thought about a book on your theatres project? From what I've seen at your website and elsewhere, it appears to be a great body of work suitable for book/portfolio.
Posted by: Doug Howk | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 12:28 PM
"The Pike Theater was mothballed for a while, but is now restored and operating through the season."
You mean there's hope of recovering my adolescence after all?! Naw, I'd just fall asleep in the front seat next to my (lovely) wife.
Posted by: Ken Tanaka | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 01:08 PM
Helcio, watch for the upcoming post on making the prints.
Doug, from the beginning (or that morning at The Pike, at least) I've envisioned the Drive-ins project as a book just as much as a portfolio or exhibition of prints. I've written a thorough text on the history, and have conducted many fascinating interviews. Take it from me, boring people do not run drive-in theaters in the twenty-first century!
At this point I need one more colossal road trip to photograph the theaters in the southwest and up the west coast.
Posted by: Carl Weese | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 03:11 PM
Hi Ken,
I almost responded to your comment in the other thread, to hold out a glimmer of hope about recovering lost youth. Then I thought it would be more fun to let you find out here when this post went up. The Pike may be young again, but we are, er, hmm....mature.
Posted by: Carl Weese | Tuesday, 27 April 2010 at 04:34 PM
Hey Carl. great stuff. Brings back memories for me of my Burke & James days.
I think Karsh used the commercial ektar for most of his famous portraits.
Posted by: paul bailey | Wednesday, 28 April 2010 at 05:35 AM
Beaucoup de merci des renseignements utiles.
Posted by: Henri Ennui-Banal | Wednesday, 28 April 2010 at 06:39 PM