I got some sixty submissions today when I asked for help in changing our header. To those who made submissions that weren't selected, thanks very much for your kindness! Sixty alternatives proved an embarrassment of riches—virtually all of them were better than I could have done, and thus would have served the purpose. There were some very interesting interpretations and variations.
The one I chose is by TOP reader Jesse Speer, a nature photographer and graphic designer from Bozeman, Montana, USA, who photographs mostly in the Rocky Mountains. His website is extensive, and gives you a good idea what he's all about. Lots more pictures as good as the one above.
Jesse tells me he's been reading TOP since 2007.
For the record, I guess I should apologize for the "contest" casting of the original post. I should have just made it a straightforward appeal for help. Several readers objected to the "for spec" call for work. No offense—I just thought it would be more fun letting someone else do it than doing it myself again. I did try, initially, to work with a graphics firm here in Wisconsin, but basically my budget is just too small. What I paid Jesse is about all I comfortably could have paid, so this wasn't an attempt to get work for free or "on the cheap."
Anyway, thanks again for all the good submissions—I literally could have used any of them, and about ten were really excellent. And thanks again to Jesse, who says he's going to use the money to help pay for a new GF1 kit. Good man!
Mike
Send this post to a friend
Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. More...
Right on Jesse.
Posted by: charlie | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 04:32 PM
Care to share the top ten finalists?
MS
Posted by: MichaelS | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 04:40 PM
Elegant, Restrained, Legible and I dare say, won't pall quickly. Good choice, good work.
KG
Cornwall.UK
Posted by: Kerry Glasier | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 04:40 PM
What the heck? I pretty much read your column every day. I read about the contest this morning just before work and I get home to find out it is over. Good thing I noticed the update before I spent too much time on it, I already spent the hour drive home mulling over ideas.
I think you should have given it at least a week or two.
Posted by: Jim | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 04:42 PM
Congrats to Jesse. I think he got the look right (even though I still prefer my submissions ;-).
There's spec work and then there's Spec work. I never do Spec work.
As a designer I would have been happy to submit some samples even if you hadn't offered a reward. The reward was a nice plus however.
I don't think Mike makes much money from this blog (ie he's not rich, not looking to "monetize" the header). And for the sake of a little header on a blog, going through portfolios would be a bit silly. This site gives all of us (readers) a lot for nothing. Tough to be criticizing Mike for spec work when, in a way, that's what he does every day with this site.
This sort of spec work doesn't bother me in the least. And I don't think it's all that fair to be critical of it.
Posted by: Paddy C | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 04:46 PM
Like it, Mike. Looks good.
Mark
Posted by: Mark L. Power | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 04:46 PM
"I think you should have given it at least a week or two."
Dennis and Jim,
Sorry! I just figured since I'd gotten one I liked, and gotten the NO!SPEC finger wagged in my face, I shouldn't ask for more help than I in fact needed.
If we ever get around to doing a photo contest, the rules, terms, and durations will be more carefully mapped out.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 04:47 PM
I know I wouldn't have won, I just wanted to try.
Posted by: Jim | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 04:53 PM
Glad you like it! I was wondering about how long this would go on -- my first chance to work on anything for it would be tomorrow evening. But I really should do other stuff then anyway, and now I don't have to decide, so that's okay.
It does look as if your description of what you wanted had some relationship to what you really wanted -- at least, the one you chose is very much what you said you wanted. Not all clients can manage that!
And the photo of Jesse's that you show is striking, I must find time to go and look at more.
Posted by: David Dyer-Bennet | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 05:00 PM
Good choice! Shockingly Mike, you went with a look that wouldn't be out of place on the cover of photography books(!) by John Sexton, Ansel Adams, Paula Chamlee, John Szarkowski, or the Aperture series - an inclination consistent with the frequent photo-book posts on TOP.
At first I thought the color scheme was too muted, but I think it will wear well and won't clash with those photos of newly announced pink and blue m4/3 cameras. It's definitely more tasteful than the headers on most of the other photography sites I frequent.
Nice job, Jesse.
Posted by: Robert Noble | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 05:14 PM
Elegant and effective.
And yes, Jesse's website is a pleasure to view.
Posted by: Rob Atkins | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 05:15 PM
That's one wonderfully elegant header. Well done Jesse!
Posted by: Kevin Schoenmakers | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 05:21 PM
So I'm sitting in Google Reader thinking, isn't he at least going to show us what it looks like?
... oh, right.
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 05:29 PM
Mike:
I thought you picked up a GF1. But not a word about it since. Curious.
PS - Nice header.
Posted by: fjf | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 05:40 PM
Nice choice, Mike and kudos to you both. Very simple, clean and elegant.
Posted by: Joe Boris | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 05:45 PM
It looks good. Almost as good as the one I sent :)
Posted by: Chuck Kimmerle | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 05:51 PM
A lovely new header !
Now...maybe change the color of the sidebars and header background to that same nice yellowish color of the T, O and P ??
It would be...hmmm....refreshing I think. :-)
Posted by: Andrea Blum | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 06:20 PM
It's too classy. I can't ignore it like I could the old, homely one, and it makes me feel unkempt and underdressed. I might get used to it, but I have a feeling it's going to goad the publisher into a site-wide makeover, which will take more getting used to, and make me feel like I should shave and comb my hair before I visit my favorite blog.
Posted by: robert e | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 06:50 PM
Hi Mike,
Awesome...er, very nice. I love the "Edited by". Now that's what I'm talkin' about.
Chris
Posted by: Christopher Lane | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 07:08 PM
Call me a curmudgeon, but I preferred the old one...
Posted by: Alec Myers | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 07:26 PM
That is a gorgeous landscape. I too would love to see the top ten!
Posted by: C. Wade | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 07:39 PM
"make me feel like I should shave and comb my hair before I visit"
robert,
If I don't, why should you? [g]
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 07:53 PM
Alec,
Okay--you're a curmudgeon. [s]
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 07:54 PM
Nice crisp header! I will be reminded not to slouch while reading TOP from now on.
And the the photo ... "Winter Gateway" by the creator of said header ... I can't take my eyes off it. Stunning work.
Posted by: Kent | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 08:13 PM
Header aside, Jesse's website is fantastic. I might even add one of his prints to my collection.
Posted by: Jeff | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 08:31 PM
Looks very National Geographic!
Posted by: Max | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 08:56 PM
Wow! That was quick! And it looks really nice!
You've set a great example of how to get things done for those blockheads (of all stripes) in Washington. I say we let you reform healthcare, Mike! (Larger Amazon gift certificate for the winning suggestion, of course.)
Posted by: Stephen Gillette | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 08:58 PM
Couldn't have said it better myself, Paddy.
It's good to step out of lurkdom and contribute something here at Mike's Place. I appreciate the feedback on the graphic ... and especially the kind words about my website/photography.
Posted by: Jesse Speer | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 10:54 PM
I like it. Good work, Mr. Speer.
Mike, the new header's color plays off Jesse Speer's photograph. I'll be interested to see what the looks like once you have an new post superseding that one at the top of the page.
Posted by: Mani Sitaraman | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 11:10 PM
I was hoping for something a little more Vegas.
Like, the words spelled out in red dots, then T-O-P flashing one letter at a time, like the USA chant: T-O-P, T-O-P, T-O-P, then all together: TOP - TOP -TOP; then the whole thing explodes into fireworks, from which you see glowing red letters emerge, with amber, blinking, pointing-hand signs on each side of M-I-K-E J-O-H-N-S-T-O-N, followed by MIKE JOHNSTON-MIKE JOHNSTON-MIKE JOHNSTON, and then, even bigger JOHNSTON-JOHNSTON-JOHNSTON, followed by an appropriated head of The Dude, from the Big Lebowski, saying, "My Johnston?", followed by another burst of fireworks that takes us back to the beginning. And then repeat.
But no. I'm ignored, an artist disdained in his own time.
Posted by: John Camp | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 12:16 AM
"And thanks again to Jesse, who says he's going to use the money to help pay for a new GF1 kit. Good man! - Mike "
In one word, GF1 is just a pleasure to use.
Shortcoming? Way too many features. :)
Posted by: Frank | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 12:19 AM
Well, put me down as one of the antis. I think small caps looks quite snobby and thus this new banner doesn't match TOP's style. :/
Posted by: Reid | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 12:23 AM
It must look good, because I didn't notice it changed before I read this. :-) Congrats Jesse
Posted by: Jammy | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 01:04 AM
Mike, the new header is great, one again you smoked Rockwell. But the reference to changing the trim to match the header is a good one.... Which would include turning the center column white and making the L & R vertical bars the darker brown, as both moves would enhance readability. As it is now, there isn't enough contrast between the columns and the text is wide, so eyes wander off track too easily.
As for the color scheme -- having changed more than my share of diapers -- I wouldn't overdo the use of the more intense yellow next to the brown -- save it for highlighting things. Or perhaps I should say, "marking".
Posted by: Felix | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 02:26 AM
Nice work Jesse. Great choice Mike, very elegant, as classy as the site.
Posted by: Bill Symmons | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 02:32 AM
It is gentle on the eyes.
I guess most professional designer would have chosen to cut the size (amount of screen real estate) down a considerable amount.
Less is more and I reckon the header could be more elegant at half the depth. This would leave more depth for the images you use in each entry.
Depending on your screen resolution the header takes up a third(1024x768) or a quarter (1280x1024) of the screen depth.
Posted by: Louis McCullagh | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 04:59 AM
"...followed by an appropriated head of The Dude, from the Big Lebowski, saying, "My Johnston?", followed by another burst of fireworks..."
John,
That one barely lost out.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 05:09 AM
Well done, Jesse. The more I look at it, the more I like it.
I had designed a header, but thought I would look at it in the morning to see if I still liked it, before sending it in. Doh! and double doh!
Talking of design Mike, how's your kitchen coming on?
Posted by: Roger Bradbury | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 06:29 AM
Like Jesse Speer's portfolio a lot, his header design not really. It looks "altbacken". That's German and literally means "oldbaken" connoting something that is from yesterday (yellowish-ocre, like yesterday's bread). Alternatively, one could say your new header looks like spineless corporate design - don't scratch, don't irritate, please everybody.
In any case, it's your blog, your site and your header (it's my party and I cry if I want to ...). I'm just a guest who takes in whatever you serve. It's always a joy to devour your writing so your new restaurant logo won't stop me from ordering your meal.
Posted by: Michael Schwabe | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 09:00 AM
Nice, but one minor suggestion: this banner would work much better as a GIF file, rather than a JPG. On my screen I can notice some visible artifacts from JPG compression.
Posted by: Tom Deater | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 10:11 AM
+1 for matching the T O P and sidebars colours :-)
Posted by: Thiago Silva | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 10:25 AM
Mr Speer's work is good and all, but John Camp "for the win."
Posted by: Timo | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 11:14 AM
I'm traveling in India and have logged in a couple of times to get a little comfort food from reading TOP.
I think the new header looks lovely.
Posted by: David | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 11:33 AM
Although I was very proud of my own version, I also think Jesse Speer's is really damn handsome.
It also makes good use of the subtleties one can get into such a large banner.
And since I already have a GF1 myself, he is more than welcome to the prize!
Posted by: Eolake Stobblehouse | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 04:32 PM
Did all of the archived articles also have to get the new header? How will we ever feel nostalgic, let alone keep track? [g]
Posted by: Jeff | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 04:47 PM
I like it. Simple, yet elegant.
One little criticism though: the kerning seems a little rough, particularly on the word "Photographer".
Posted by: Craig A | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 05:37 PM
Mike,
I think the new header is a great improvement. I believe it would become a classic if you changed the beige tones to grey. All other info - adverts and images in color
/Users/melvinso/Desktop/OLP BxW.jpg
Posted by: Melvin Sokolsky | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 07:29 PM
Hmm... I must be feeling peckish.
I always thought a "header" was something one took when falling down the staircase.
In any event a change now and then is good for the soul.
Posted by: Bryce Lee | Thursday, 25 February 2010 at 01:25 AM
I love it.
Posted by: Tom K. | Friday, 26 February 2010 at 02:49 PM
Does any one know what font is this?
It's beautiful.
Posted by: Mr. Tambourine Man | Monday, 01 March 2010 at 01:23 AM