Photographs by Peter Turnley
-Introduction: This is a significant occasion at The Online Photographer. It marks the first time we've published a significant body of original photojournalism. The following 50-picture photo essay is a World exclusive of new work shot a little more than a week ago by my friend the great photojournalist Peter Turnley.
To put you in context, the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti killed as many people as were killed by the atomic bombing of Hiroshima that ended World War II, in roughly the same time frame. Coverage of every phase of crises is important, with the earliest being usually the most noticed, but Peter has covered major earthquakes in Armenia, Iran, and Turkey, and he knows the whole story will have a much longer arc. He knows that the hardship continues, the human drama has phases and rhythms. Peter also speaks French fluently, which was tremendously helpful in enabling him to communicate with the average Haitian. He wanted to be able to talk to people, listen to them, hear their stories—and express to them his condolences, sorrow, and hopes for the future. The resulting essay is a narrative in pictures of a time three weeks after the event, after the shock has begun to subside, when the Haitian people are beginning to assess their losses, mourn and bury their dead, and start the struggle to rebuild and heal. It's a portrait of a people making their tentative first steps back to normal everyday living. As you'll see, these photographs don't linger on gore, degradation, and obliteration, even though those things are ever-present and impossible to ignore. They show the faces of the people and their enormous struggle to find life again after so much death. It was a moment between death and life.
The important thing to Peter is to do his part to keep the world's attention focused on the people of Haiti and their continuing recovery. For many of the people you're about to meet, the story of the earthquake will continue to unfold for years, certainly long after the swarming news photographers are gone and the torrent of aid has slowed to a trickle.
It remains to be seen how photojournalism will continue to evolve in the new millennium, through new media. One thing that's immediately obvious is that we can easily present many more pictures than a space-constrained newsmagazine. One thing that won't change is the enormous commitment of time, energy, money and skill needed to create such work—and our need to have not just one, but many different and distinctive photographic perspectives on events. Thanks to Peter, TOP can be part of that conversation.
—Mike
A burial in the Grand Cimetière of Port-au-Prince, Haiti. With more than two hundred thousand people killed by the magnitude 7.0 earthquake in Haiti on Jan. 12, Haitians continue to bury their dead. Port-au-Prince, Feb. 1, 2010.
The General Hospital of Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Hundreds of thousands of Haitians have been left seriously injured. Jan. 31, 2010.
Irana Cemelus, 54, a victim of the Haitian earthquake, is buried by her family in the Grand Cimetière of Port-au-Prince. Feb.3, 2010.
With many churches and cathedrals destroyed by the earthquake, Haitians pray outdoors, near the Champs de Mars, Port-au-Prince. Sunday, Jan. 31.
A victim of the Haiti earthquake is brought to be prepared for burial at the the morgue of the General Hospital of Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Jan.31.
Bemur Lidthany, 28, with her baby girl, Christaly Lidthany, born 25 minutes earlier at the Hopital de la Paix in Port-au-Prince. Jan. 31, 2010.
A food distribution near the Champs de Mars in central Port-au-Prince. Feb.1.
At the Hopital de la Paix of Port-au-Prince, a young man learns to walk with one leg after a recent amputation as a result of his serious injuries during the earthquake. Jan.31, 2010.
Several million people have been left homeless and/or injured. Many people still sleep outdoors in the streets. Delmas district, Port-au-Prince, Jan. 31, 2010.
Jean Grousse looks for his son, Gerd Belizaire, 33, in the morgue of the General Hospital of Port-au-Prince.
A young woman and her recently born baby are among the millions of Haitians who have been left homeless as a result of the Haiti earthquake. Near the Champs de Mars, Port-au-Prince. Jan. 31, 2010.
At the major outdoor market La Saline, on the outskirts of Port-au-Prince, Haiti, men burn and butcher pigs that have been slaughtered. Feb. 2, 2010.
At a makeshift camp at the Champs de Mars, Haitians bath themselves outdoors. Jan. 31.
A young woman, with her right arm recently amputated, in a tent in front of the General Hospital of Port-au-Prince. Feb. 2.
A body is tagged with an identification number at the morgue of the General Hospital of Port-au-Prince, Haiti. This one of thousands of dead bodies have been brought to this morgue since the earthquake. Jan. 31, 2010.
Haitians left homeless by the earthquake stand in line waiting for food near the city of Fontamara, on the road to Rail. Feb. 2, 2010.
A makeshift tent encampment. Feb. 3.
The General Hospital of Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Jan. 31, 2010.
Jean Grousse looks for his son, Gerd Belizaire, 33, in the morgue of the General Hospital of Port-au-Prince, Haiti. He could not find him. Jan. 31, 2010.
Micheline Merius, 22, homeless since the earthquake, sleeps nightly on the streets of Delmas 10/12. Feb. 2.
At the General Hospital, Feb. 3.
Between Port-au-Prince and Leogane. Feb. 3.
Champs de Mars. Jan. 31.
A body being taken for burial outside the morgue of the General Hospital. Jan. 31, 2010.
A morning food distribution run by the World Food Program in Delmas 62, Port-au-Prince. Feb. 1.
Dr. Lora Chamberlain, from Chicago, examines X-rays of an injured man in a temporary medical tent outside of the hospital. She is a volunteer with AMHE, the Association of Haitian Physicians Abroad. Feb. 2, 2010.
United Nations soldiers oversee a food distribution in central Port-au-Prince. Feb. 2.
Slowly, daily life commerce returns to Port-au-Prince. Feb.2, 2010.
A relative of a dead victim of the earthquake accompanies a coffin on the way to burial. Jan. 31.
Dr. Heather Costello, a volunteer in Haiti from the University of Chicago, North Shore, working with IMC, the International Medical Corps, examines an injured man in a temporary medical tent outside of the General Hospital. Feb.1, 2010.
A food line outside the Hopital de la Paix, Port-au-Prince. Jan. 31.
A volunteer doctor, Dr. John Von Thron, an orthopedic surgeon from Jacksonville, Florida, takes off the cast of Meplisea Servius outside the General Hospital of Port-au-Prince. Feb. 1, 2010.
An injured man is brought to the General Hospital, Jan. 31.
Sunday prayers near the Champs de Mars in central Port-au-Prince. Jan. 31.
A food distribution near the Champs de Mars. Feb.1, 2010.
A food distribution line. Central Port-au-Prince. Feb.1, 2010.
The Grand Cimetière of Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Jan. 31, 2010.
A prayer service for victims of the Haiti earthquake, outside a hospital in Leogane, Haiti. Feb. 2, 2010.
Central Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Jan. 31.
Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Jan. 31, 2010.
A few weeks after the earthquake, while many Haitians lack food, life comes back to the grand market, La Saline, on the outskirts of Port-au-Prince. Feb. 3, 2010.
Leogane, Haiti, Feb. 2.
Thousands of homeless Haitians live in a makeshift encampment at the Champs de Mars in central Haiti. Jan. 31, 2010.
Fritz Larose, 59, right, buries his son Clifford, 24 in the Grand Cimetière of Port-au-Prince, Feb. 1, 2010. He lost both his daughter and son when their house collapsed during the earthquake.
A mother and son in a makeshift encampment for homeless Haitians in the Champs de Mars, Port-au-Prince. Jan. 31.
An injured victim of the earthquake at the General Hospital of Port-au-Prince. Feb. 1.
Thousands of victims of the Haiti earthquake live in a makeshift tent encampment in the Champs de Mars. Jan. 31, 2010.
Homeless victims at an encampment on the outskirts of Port-au-Prince. Feb. 2.
Port-au-Prince, Jan. 31, 2010.
A young man accompanies the casket of a dead victim on the way to burial. Port-au-Prince, Haiti, Jan. 31, 2010.
• • •
-
Featured Comment by Pema Wangmo: "The next time I'm about to complain about something I will see the image of the mother and her son in a makeshift shelter: a piece of cardboard(!) against a pole with their few belongs piled up. Thank you Peter for making it real.
Featured Comment by Heather Costello, MD: "I was one of the doctors there and am incredibly impressed by Peter's 'eye' for the devastation and chaos. Yes, there are many photos out there, but these actually show the truth. True art from true suffering. Peter's empathy is apparent. None of these were 'sensationalist' only very real and very honest."
[Heather is shown in picture #30 of this set —Ed.]
Featured Comment by Gilles: "I've tried to wrap my head around 200,000 dead. Millions homeless. The one thing that unfortunately even fantastic photojournalism such as this can't convey is the full sensory experience of such a tragedy. The sounds and smells are missing otherwise I think we would all be overwhelmed completely. I can't imagine the task of walking through the open morgues in the heat to take these images. The images stand mute without the cacophony of the moans of the injured, and the wailing of the mourners and the newborn children. The feeling of concrete dust gritting in your teeth while you seek to capture a story.
"Thank you Peter Turnley for giving us this glimpse into a tragedy. I think most of us while critiquing these images soon forget that a human was behind the camera and that no matter how much experience they may have, they still must be overwhelmed being present at these scenes."
Awesome photos, gave me the chills!
Posted by: Kevin Schoenmakers | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 09:29 AM
Thanks to Mr. Turnley and TOP for presenting this. Photo #20 is really touching, really incredible.
A number of times, I found myself want to magnify a certain part of an image to see what was there: to look at faces in a crowd, to see what is being sold in a market. The extra detail available in the original photos seems like a resource that's untapped online. I'd to have a digital loupe of sorts while looking at such a great presentation of photos.
Posted by: Aaron Dill | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 09:53 AM
A landmark post all the way, Mike; and the pictures are truly moving, besides their technical excellence.
Posted by: Cateto/Jose | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 09:56 AM
Just outstanding on all fronts...
From the doctors, to the journalists, all the way to the Haitian people themselves for having such a stiff upper lip in the face of such overwhelmingly miserable odds.
Thank You Mike and Peter.
Posted by: charlie | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 10:00 AM
Thank you for this presentation Mike. I'll need to revisit, it's hard to see the photographs through the tears.
Tim
Posted by: Tim Bishop | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 10:04 AM
If you think having more photographs is the way to go then a flickr search for "Haiti Earthquake" will give you 20,000 or so.
I though photojournalism was about quality over quantity and about editing the mass of information in the many into something more telling amd meaningful pf the few and succinct.
Posted by: Steven House | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 10:05 AM
"I though photojournalism was about quality over quantity"
Steven,
Yes, and it's also about giving photographers the space they need to present the edit of their work that they think is most effective. Let's ask Jim Nachtwey if he thought the four photographs in last week's Time magazine photo essay told the full story he wanted to tell about the aftermath of the earthquake, and then maybe you'll see my point.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 10:32 AM
Somehow I feel that the best photojournalism of tragedies is still most effective in B&W. These are pure color pictures, no doubt about it, and a few are only effective because of the color, but it almost "prettyfies" the situation.
As much as I admire and respect Peter Turley's work, I can't help wonderng what if these had been done 50 years ago by Gene Smith or DDD?
(PS, Don't think that I've seen ANY B&W photos from this event.)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 10:35 AM
I know these photos don't tell the whole story of the devastation in Haiti, but they certainly speak to me. Peter Turnley is a master at telling a story of pain and suffering with beautiful images. Thank you!
Posted by: Bonnie | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 11:01 AM
TOP-notch coverage, Peter. Thanks so much for presenting it here.
I choose to abstain from discussing the state and future of photojournalism in this article. I'd rather just let Peter's images speak for their subject.
Posted by: Ken Tanaka | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 11:08 AM
Thank you Peter for your moving, excellent photo-essay.
Thank you Mike for hosting it.
For me, it is this kind of still photography series
that reveals the depths of this Haitian tragedy
because we are not panned past it at high speed
as we are in video news reports.
We stop at each photo, linger and begin to truly feel
the pain caused by the earthquake.
Posted by: Andrea Blum | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 11:34 AM
Peter and Mike, thanks for sharing (and Mike, BTW - yes, I _do_ like the format, but I am not one for sound bytes...)
To me, Peter, it is about the things you caught, the resignation, the religiosity, the daily struggle - and also the promise, as in the new mom's image.
But yes, not letting the media (politicians, governments, etc) forget Haiti
mike c
Posted by: Michael C | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 11:55 AM
I don't understand how the question of quality v. quantity can be brought forth in this post. ALL of Mr. Turnley's pictures here are of very high quality.
Posted by: Tony Rowlett | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 12:11 PM
Great series of photos. Very powerful stuff. If the rich nations had just contributed to Haiti's well being for the past 100 years rather than ignore their plight then maybe, just maybe, the death toll would have been significantly less. Haiti has nothing resource hungry nations want so they were easily passed over. Then again where do you draw the line when it comes to welfare for poor nations.
Posted by: Eric Rose | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 12:11 PM
Brilliant work Peter!
The coverage of the aftermath has been significant with many great photojournalists creating images. Yet the true level of desperation of a mother and child seems much stronger . There is something truly special about your work . It is quite obvious to me that you are able to transfer your feelings into this essay.
I am very glad that you had the opportunity to create it and then for Mike s helping you share it with others.
Posted by: Roger Dunham | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 12:17 PM
They went from desperate to Hobbesian.
Posted by: misha | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 12:23 PM
I'm not sure if this TOP posting is about the tragedy in Haiti and the people there - in which case these photos and the '20,000' on Flkr are worth looking at and thinking about and trying to help - or about photojournalism, ala Gene Smith, etc. - in which case these photos are open to another type comment. In thinking further, and I hope not stretching things too far, it's sort of like showing a set of pictures from the camps at the end of WWII and talking about the photographer. This ain't about photojournalism. Just my 2 cents.
Posted by: Ray Hudson | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 12:34 PM
@ Bill Mitchell: "Somehow I feel that the best photojournalism of tragedies is still most effective in B&W."
Perhaps true of European or Asian settings. But not here. Haiti is all about vibrant Caribbean color. Seeing such energetic, festive colors as a backdrop for such misery greatly strengthens the statement of these images in a very genuine, honest manner.
Posted by: Ken Tanaka | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 12:58 PM
i am totally with Bill Mitchell here.. when looking at the images the colour didnt add any information for me. and the composition and light that Peter Turnley is seeing and capturing just cries "greyscale!" to me...
still, the pictures are very impactful.
Posted by: GRUBERND | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 01:00 PM
Eloquent story telling.
Posted by: Ben Lieberman | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 01:22 PM
Wow. This is both exceptional and exceptionally sad and Andrea Blum said exactly what I would have struggled to say. Thanks to everyone involved in getting this work out here.
Posted by: Bahi | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 01:27 PM
Thank you Mike for the TOP presentation. It is a very moving photo-essay. As to Stephen House's comment: "I though photojournalism was about quality over quantity ..."
I would add to Mike's response, that this IS a quality presentation, done with enough photography to deeply convey the emotional impact of this tragedy, and stands as a testament to the Haitian peoples will power to carry on in the face of adversity.
What it isn't, is a presentation done in typical internet snippets and for that, I say thanks again MIke. this is what makes this site a part of my daily life.
Posted by: Mark Kinsman | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 02:02 PM
The story lines are innumerable. Did Peter G. find his son? Did that bag of rice make it 'home' safely? What becomes of the Grande Cemetery once the rains come? What did we see and, take a stop watch, when did we see it? Then we look again. And again.
I knew Peter Turnley would get there to capture his account of the post-quake experience but couldn't imagine the depth of feelings these images evoke. Thanks to Mike for hosting and, well, Peter: "Carry on." We need you, our lens on the ground in Haiti.
Posted by: Jennifer Bohrnstedt | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 02:14 PM
Just superb.
A tip, just in case some people haven't discovered this: I've noticed previously that my RSS feed reader will show the 'pop-up' (i.e. bigger) version of the image rather than the smaller one you see on the website.
Normally this is a minor convenience, but both for the last Peter Turnley post and this one it is a huge improvement to read in the RSS reader.
Posted by: ScottF | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 02:44 PM
Thanks for these photographs.
I agree with Andrea Blum. This series gives us essentially a number of stories on the earthquake. I think it more effective in communicating the chaos and pain than the coverage in news programmes with video footage, giving us every few seconds another scene without the time to ponder.
Gert Visser
Posted by: Gert Visser | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 02:53 PM
Impressive work and selective focusing masterfully applied. Simply no comparison to tv reporters hangin'round the airport. Thank you for posting the entire series.
Posted by: Silvio Pertunes | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 03:07 PM
"To put you in context, the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti killed as many people as were killed by the atomic bombing of Hiroshima that ended World War II, in roughly the same time frame."
Small, but significant correction: The people in Haiti were killed and injured directly by their dwellings, buildings and structures. A seven point earthquake should be survivable with mostly minor injuries. I hope that they can rebuild with better designs.
Posted by: Keith B. | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 03:50 PM
I've been wrestling with this all day. Please feel free to edit or moderate this comment out entirely, since I am obviously reacting emotionally!
These photos irritate me -- these could have been taken any day in Haiti during the last 40 years. There's no story in these photos beyond 'holy cow, there sure are a lot of black people in Haiti, and there's some busted stuff' which is a story that every sequence of photos we're seen has told, and which is a story that has been true every day for 40 years -- earthquake or no. This looks like a bunch of colorful, random snapshots. Some of them are quite good as photographs. As photojournalism, there's no there there, that I can see.
This is not really a criticism of Peter Turnley as it is a criticism of ALL the photojournalism going on in Haiti now.
Just thinking out loud here, but for instance: Can you tell me more about Bemur Lidthany and her baby? How about Jean Grousse and his search for his son? These are stories that I am NOT going to see on every single news web site. These are stories that are NOT simply 'Holy crap there are a lot of black people in Haiti, and a bunch of fallen-down buildings.'
I apologize for my tone, which I'm sure is wilder-eyed and more ranty than I want it to be.
I also direct your attention to: http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/essay-13/ which probably informs my irritation far too much.
Posted by: Andrew Molitor | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 04:02 PM
Most amazing!
Posted by: Jane | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 04:02 PM
Keith B: ..."Small, but significant correction:"
Wrong. Small and insignificant.
Posted by: Leigh Youdale | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 04:30 PM
Leigh and Keith,
Let's not get into an argument here. Keith has a point: better construction standards would have saved lives. But Leigh has a point too: it is what it is, and a person killed by a falling building is no less dead. We live in the buildings that exist in our societies: most Haitians, just like most Americans or Europeans, don't have a chance to change the status quo. How many buildings can YOU change? I'm sure most Haitians would love to own a building, and I'm sure most don't. I didn't even specify the construction standards of the house I live in, and it's the only building I can come close to saying I own. Just because a tragedy is by some measure preventable doesn't mean it's less of a tragedy. Maybe the opposite, even (as was the case in China when substandard contracting in the construction of schools, together with the earthquake there, caused many children's deaths).
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 04:38 PM
Andrew,
If you'll pardon me for saying so, I think you're a candidate to donate a month of your time in Haiti as a volunteer. Or even a week. You seem to find it easy to dismiss the suffering of the earthquake victims just because they come from a poor (even, yes, backward) country, and you seem not to see their humanity, just that they're black. That's your only real indictment of Peter's work here--he hasn't helped you to see that this is an extraordinary situation and that it has happened to real people.
I suspect you might benefit from some "time on the ground." Forgive me if you feel that's not appropriate for me to suggest, or if I'm not seeing more subtlety in your argument.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 04:45 PM
Haiti was a very troubled country already before the earthquake. To anyone interested in the reasons I recommend reading the comparison between Haiti and the Dominican Republic in Jared Diamond's book "Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed".
Carsten
Posted by: Carsten Bockermann | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 05:11 PM
These photos are a wonderful balance between competence and giving the world an insight. Photojournalism must be a combination of both and these are excellent.
Posted by: John Ellis | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 05:21 PM
Thanks for posting Peter's photo essay Mike. I have a daughter in Haiti. She is the medical liaison to DART, Canada's Disaster Assistance Response Team and has been there since the earthquake began (within hours of course). I am sure she has seen much of the devastation and misery experienced by the Haitian people who remain strong in the face of such a horror.
Ron
Posted by: Ron Joiner | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 05:41 PM
What contrasts. The sheer scale of the devastation and obliteration are difficult to comprehend, yet amongst the horror is joy in the face of the woman with the new baby. Learning to walk again, yet the expression of the woman with her arm just amputated. Prayers in the street yet so many coffins.
Great storytelling and many thanks for posting. Please ensure these moving images (and others of similar ilk) remind us that Haiti needs sustained help, not just in the immediate aftermath.
Posted by: Pete T | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 05:49 PM
I was watching the story unfold and didn't think of the pictures as color "or should have been black-and-white". Peter has done a wonderful job in showing a narrative of emotion and spirit.
Thanks Mike!
Posted by: ben ng | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 06:37 PM
Over and over I am overwhelmed by the "EYE" of Peter Turnley. I sat and viewed each image and felt the sadness. The horror of losing so many people so quickly makes for a loss of words. How much more can the Haitian people endure? Thank you Peter
Posted by: Bob D. | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 07:03 PM
"Thanks Mike!"
Don't thank me, really. It's all P.T.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 07:43 PM
These photos really bring home the magnitude of the catastrophe. Thank you
Posted by: Jeremy Hodes | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 07:45 PM
I've been to Haiti, and while I certainly claim no special knowledge, that's how it looked when I was there 20 years ago. An essay indistinguishable from this one save for the captions could have been done then.
The suffering and damage is, as we all know, staggeringly huge -- this essay does nothing to show that, which is in no way an indictment of the essay. This essay appears to be striving for something more intimate, and I respect the effort. It's a sound idea.
The problem, for me, is that the essay, in stepping back from the gigantic, the staggering, the mind-destroying horror, retreats too far and winds up completely unconnected from it. It looks like some nice photographs of Haiti and Haitians, with some funeral shots, and a handful of recently injured people.
I don't know how to solve the problem of doing an intimate photo essay, focusing in on the small and personal in the midst of a disaster, but (again, for me) this essay isn't a solution.
Again, I apologize if my tone is ranty or unpleasant, I mean no disrespect to you, Mike, or to Peter. I will take no offense if you assume all problems lie with the viewer!
Posted by: Andrew Molitor | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 08:17 PM
200,000 dead in Haiti, and here we are, debating whether these photos would be more impactful in black & white. We Americans sure have our priorities straight, don't we?
Posted by: Bill Rogers | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 10:56 PM
There's only so much any photo-essay can DO. Even a powerful photograph, whatever that may be to you or mean to you, is still JUST a photograph. Is a photo better if it makes you cry? Is it worse if it's doesn't meet the same technical standards we expect from an arranged photo?
I think Peter-the-Photographer has done an outstanding job working with what he had to work with. These are real people genuinely captured during emotional moments, and they made me want to give (I have, and will more); made me think about religion and God and missionaries and prayers and whether Belief helps or hurts. Photos make you think like that.
There has been no shortage of photos of Haiti--it's been impossible to avoid them. Showing us more here is helpful and good because ultimately cameras are not just about glass lust and brandery, but about writing with light (or pixels?), and Peter did a great job with that. Good work, Peter, and thanks for hosting-posting, Mike.
Posted by: Grant Petersen | Tuesday, 09 February 2010 at 11:46 PM
Just wanted to say that these photos appear bigger (their original size) by default in my RSS reader than they do on the site itself. Here we have to click on a photo to see it bigger. Not sure if this is a limitation of the blog format but it does diminish the impact of the photos somewhat.
Posted by: Manish | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 02:07 AM
"I choose to abstain from discussing the state and future of photojournalism in this article. I'd rather just let Peter's images speak for their subject." Ken Tanaka
A discussion worth having, and we should.
"The problem, for me, is that the essay, in stepping back from the gigantic, the staggering, the mind-destroying horror, retreats too far and winds up completely unconnected from it." - Andrew Molitor
I understand what you're talking about, quite exactly. The last major story I covered as a newspaper journalist was the burning of Yellowstone National Park in the late 80s, and there is no way that photography can cover it: you take a picture, and you get burning trees. The story wasn't burning trees, it was millions of burning trees. How do you take a picture of millions of burning trees? You can't -- if you back up, or fly over it, all you get is smoke.
Turnley faced the same problem -- dead and injured people in Haiti is hardly something new. Two hundred thousand dead and injured? That's appalling, almost beyond belief, but, how do you photograph it? This is one situation where photos and words have to support each other -- each is greatly enhanced by the other.
That said, there are some great statements among this work.
JC
Posted by: John Camp | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 02:17 AM
another images from hell:
http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue1002/hell-intro.html
Posted by: Igor | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 02:19 AM
Hi Mike, re: your phrasing, ''The catastrophic earthquake in Haiti killed as many people as were killed by the atomic bombing of Hiroshima that ended World War II.''
I'm sure the omission of the bombing of Nagasaki was unintended, but of course the timeline stands as follows:
Aug. 6, 1945 -- U.S. drops nuclear weapon on Hiroshima. (Estimated deaths 90,000-170,000)
Aug. 9, 1945 -- U.S. drops nuclear weapon on Nagasaki. (Estimated deaths 60,000-80,000)
Aug. 15, 1945 -- Japan announces surrender to Allied Powers.
Greg
Posted by: Greg McCartney | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 02:38 AM
There will be and have been many images but they haven't been very different or distinctive. For anybody that’s hoping to make a name covering such disasters, there are workshops going on in Haiti right at $1500 a go. Bring your money and your camera, leave your conscience behind. A lot of people are looking for adventure and pictures and are little more than a burden to an already blighted people
“Most photographers who come to Haiti are there to get the Pulitzer Prize, or to get a promotion at their job,” he says. “There’s only a few who really care about the country.”
Haitian photographer: Daniel Morel
http://mondoweiss.net/2009/11/haitians-like-palestinians-are-misrepresented-in-the-mainstream-press.html
It’s hard for one person to capture the sheer scale of such a tragedy, as a result most sets of images I've seen seem to be ticking boxes. I think a closer more personal study of one family's struggle to survive in the aftermath could be used as stand ins for all Haitians', the same could be done with an aid worker, a Dr or a Priest. I'm sure a photographer of Peter's standing has the kind of sensitivity needed for a such a story and I'm sure somebody will do it, but I've struggled to find it.
Posted by: Sean | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 03:06 AM
Andrew is closer to the mark than many may realise. His view mirrors my thoughts as I browsed the photos (I looked at the set first, then began reading the comments). But then I hail from Africa, and sadly sights such as these, sans the dead bodies, can be seen all across my country. They can also be seen any day of the year in India, SE Asia, South and Central America, but there is no "event" to hang it on.
Haiti is indeed a tragic disaster, but it was a disaster long before the earthquake struck. Perhaps if these photos strike the right chords with Haitians and their leaders it might not be such a disaster into the future.
Posted by: HBP | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 05:37 AM
I must say I feel uncomfortable in front of these pictures. I think that the opinion of Christopher Anderson reported on lensblog (http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/essay-13/) is worth some serious reflection.
Posted by: Andrea | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 07:25 AM
I offer no judgment on Mr. Turnley's work, but the essay & discussion in the NY Times' "Lens" blog about whether there are too many photographers in Haiti in the earthquake's aftermath seems relevant here:
http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/essay-13/
And, btw, one can see 12 of Nachtwey's Haiti photos on the Time website (who reads the paper version these days!?):
http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1957522_2030344,00.html
Posted by: Yuanchung Lee | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 08:39 AM
Greg,
I know, but the numer of casualties of Hiroshima alone is more congruent to those in the Haiti earthquake (both are approximations).
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 08:53 AM
"200,000 dead in Haiti, and here we are, debating whether these photos would be more impactful in black & white. We Americans sure have our priorities straight, don't we?"
Bill,
20 million dead in WWII and here you are, leaving comments on blog posts.
I have to say I've never understood this type of comment.
But to answer your question, I don't think it says anything whatsoever about the priorities of Americans--or anyone else.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 09:26 AM
Mike Johnston's moving prefatory essay is eloquently compelling and demonstrates a humane empathic resonance with Peter Turnley's remarkable photographic reportage. Nothing less than what this site has led us to expect.
Posted by: Ralph Eisenberg | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 10:09 AM
Thank you, Peter, for such great work.
Posted by: Brian | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 01:36 PM
Thanks for hosting this photo essay, Mr. Johnson. And special thanks to Mr. Turnley for taking them and allowing them to be hosted here.
"These photos irritate me -- these could have been taken any day in Haiti during the last 40 years.
[...]
An essay indistinguishable from this one save for the captions could have been done then."
Mr. Molitor, isn't the real problem (from the photographer's perspective) about the nature of an earthquake? It is a generally unpredictable moment of violent chaos that suddenly hits a swath of land and then stops shortly later. How do you photograph "earthquake"? As you and others have stated, a shattered building with dusty and dazed civilians milling around doesn't necessarily convey the concept. It could just as easily be aerial bombing, a sinkhole, civil war, or an architectural failure. It could also simply be How It Always Is There.
It seems nearly impossible for serious photography to create something profoundly new in this situation. You're either in the right place at the right time (and learning quickly whether image stabilization is mandatory or worthless) or, afterwards, you manage to pick out and communicate a detail that relates to the idea of the earth shifting under our feet without our consent. Everything else is typically (though not necessarily average or common in a value sense) the documentary, reportage, and getting-on-with-our-lives style of photography. How many shots of cracked walls work visually? http://bit.ly/bAv2xF
As such, I think criticizing the above photo essay because it doesn't transcend what seems to be a very substantial barrier is criticism misplaced. Valid in a broad sense because we should always press for improvement, but still neglectful of the visual challenge the situation presents.
Posted by: Charles Hueter | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 02:08 PM
I want to be involved in the documentation and photography of these events in Haiti. I am a photography student at Texas State University and I was wondering if anyone had any information on places I can contact or work with, or where to stay when I get to Haiti in March? If anyone has any info, email me: [email protected]
Posted by: Daniel Mora | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 03:48 PM
Oh my word!!
This is photojournalism at its very best. The portfolio tells the large scale story and the individual photographs are just sensational. I have a dear friend, Roger Dunham, who recently studied with Peter and they are now pretty good friends. He has nothing but superlatives for both the man and his body of work. How, after this, could you not agree.
Woody Spedden
Posted by: Elwood (Woody) Spedden | Wednesday, 10 February 2010 at 08:48 PM
Mike, thanks for giving this amount of space to Peter Turnley's images of the Haiti catastrophy. Events like that shouldn't have to be pressed into singular images, but the attention span the magazines (realistically) calculate with will probably not allow an in-depth coverage, even less an individual view.
What I found interesting in the remarks were the references to b&w images, at least once labelled as 'better suitable' for this kind of reportage. I don't see this purely as a matter of esthetics. Of course you can better abstract when leaving color aside, but this abstraction in the true sense also allows a distancing of the own feelings from the scenery in the image. In Peter's images, many details are so very familiar for us, and now they are shown in the context of such an incredible disaster. They come at us, haunting, at least at me, and this is when an understandable reaction would wish for more distance: this is "their" catastrophy, this is "their" plight.
In this way Peter Turnley's images are powerful in a very subtle way, differently from the Nachtwey images chosen for print/display in Time Magazine.
Posted by: Markus Spring | Thursday, 11 February 2010 at 02:00 AM
Great work, Peter. When I heard of the quake, I wondered if you would make the trek to Haiti, and...sure enough. Very well done. Let's hope that in a few weeks we all have not forgotten about the devastation down there.
Posted by: Alexander Slanger | Thursday, 11 February 2010 at 04:36 PM
Peter
you have brought your humanism, your dedication and your love to this work. these are brilliant images that tell a story that is long from over. thank you for keeping the thoughts of Haiti alive. thank you for reminding us that there is still a long road ahead.
your work continues to be amazing.
Posted by: louise wales field | Thursday, 11 February 2010 at 07:53 PM
very touching...
Posted by: eugenia | Friday, 12 February 2010 at 07:53 AM
This series of photos work like all the rest of Mr. Turnley's photos work because of his immense talent and sense of humanity. It is gratifying to see so many comments on both sides of the issue, those who criticize and those who praise. Those who negatively criticize the work should not just complain, they should either suggest something better or go and do something better. Only then will they have the proper credibility to pontificate. Sure Haiti has been a disgrace for decades. Eventually something happened that points out to all of us our responsibility and complicity in letting such a deplorable situation exist in our neighborhood. Mr. Turnley has made the effort to bring the consequences of our neglect and self absorption front and center. We should praise him and be thankful for such a person to do this for us.
Posted by: Pac McLaurin | Friday, 12 February 2010 at 09:36 AM
Great job bringing images to us please continue to capture off the beaten path.
Posted by: Ifoma | Saturday, 20 February 2010 at 08:30 PM
Peter,
Your photographs are both tragic and beautiful...you have captured the horrors in Haiti with empathy. Thank you for sharing your images.
Cheryl
Posted by: diazmeyer | Tuesday, 02 March 2010 at 10:22 PM