In the comments to Ken's nifty post below about the Olympus Pen, a reader named Antony Sheperd asked, parenthetically, "how many camera designers can people name? I can think of Barnack and Maitani."
Barnack...that got me to thinking. Barnack is well known, and always gets the credit for the Leica. Rightly so, of course. But no one ever mentions Willi Stein.
Barnack's line of Leicas was long-lasting and had many offshoots, ending with the magnificent IIIg (designed by Adam Wagner) which stayed in production until 1960 and has never been anything but prized.
So who was Willi Stein? He was the designer of the M3. To be more precise, Stein designed the camera; he and Ludwig Leitz designed the rangefinder; Heinrich Schneider and Willi Keiner engineered the finder optics; and Hugo Wehrenfennig was responsible for the M bayonet. (This information comes from Erwin Puts.)
The M3 was the noble progenitor of most of the Leica M rangefinders that came after it, with the exception of the M5 and the CL, or "compact Leica," which spun off the mysterious probably-Japanese, maybe-a-little-bit-German CLE (compact Leica electronic). I don't know who was responsible for the M5 (I'm sure I'm about to find out), but Stein designed the CL too. Willi Stein's M3 design is still very much in evidence in the M8 and the new M9. They are very different cameras, of course, but they pay homage every which way to Herr Stein's design. His line of Leicas has lasted longer even than Barnack's. They've been around for more than 55 years now.
And apart from that, the M3 has only the classic folding wooden-and-brass field view camera to compete with it for the title of the prettiest camera ever made. And quite possibly the title of most significant, too.
Let's not forget Herr Barnack. But when the subject of camera designers comes up, perhaps we should spare a thought for the oft-overlooked Willi Stein once in a while, too.
Featured Comment by Marc Rochkind: "And, of course, Masahiko Fuketa, designer of the Nikon F."
Featured Comment by Chris Lucianu: "What about the most obvious name: Victor Hasselblad? By the way, this page shows Victor Hasselblad and Reinhold Heidecke (of Franke & Heidecke, makers of the legendary Rollei) taking pictures of each other."
Reinhold Heidecke and Victor Hasselblad taking pictures of each other, from hasselbladhistorical.eu
Featured Comment by Eamon Hickey: "Lots of really significant camera and lens designers aren't well known to the public because, beginning in the 1950s especially, so many of them were Japanese. And aside from Olympus's promotion of Maitani, the Japanese optics and camera companies generally follow traditional Japanese cultural norms and do not single individuals out for special recognition.
"One such person who, if he were German or American, would be known worldwide is Nikon's Zenji Wakimoto, who has to rank as one of history's great lens designers. (A Google search will turn up a little bit of info about him.) He was the lead designer on many of Nikon's most famous camera lenses from the 1950s and 1960s, but he also designed the Ultra Micro-Nikkors of the 1960s and '70s, which were industrial process lenses that were the highest resolution lenses ever made at that time.
"The Ultra Micro Nikkors evolved into today's lenses for steppers, which are without question the highest precision optics ever put into regular production. A modern top-end stepper lens can resolve a line about 1/1000th the width of a human hair; they can weigh a ton or more and can be 5 ft. long by 2 ft. in diameter, and cost several million dollars apiece."
Featured Comment by David Goldenberg: "A remarkable camera designer who hasn't been mentioned here so far is Emanuel Goldberg (no relation, so far as I know). Goldberg was the head of Zeiss Ikon in the early 1930s, before escaping from the Nazis and making his way to what was then Palestine. At Zeiss Ikon, he designed the original Contax, elements of which were copied in the Nikon rangefinder cameras of the 1950s, and eventually wound up in the Nikon F (such as the removable back).
"But, the Contax was only a very small part of his career. He worked on sensitometry and aspects of cinematography, including sound tracks.
"One of the most interesting things that he did was to devise, in the 1931, a scheme for indexing microfilm data with marks on the film edges that could be read by a photosensor. This may have been the earliest implementation of electronic indexing. In 1945, the American scientist Vanevar Bush published a very influential article, entitled 'How we may think,' that described a very similar, but hypothetical, data retrieval machine, which many people consider the conceptual ancestor of hypertext. But, Goldberg's much earlier version has never received much attention.
"Information about Goldberg can be found at a web page maintained by Michael Buckland, who has studied his work and written a book about it."
And lens designers (and their colleagues) are usually anonymous. Walther Mandler is the only name I know from the 20th century, not sure when Carl Zeiss and August(?) Petzval lived. 19th c, I think...
Posted by: Mani Sitaraman | Monday, 28 September 2009 at 10:24 PM
"...the CL, or "compact Leica," which spun off the mysterious probably-Japanese, maybe-a-little-bit-German CLE (compact Leica electronic)..."
Oh, bleah. What was so mysterious about the CLE? It was a sensible, pragmatic Minolta design through, never sold under the Leica name. It had a straightforward, rugged horizontal cloth focal-plane shutter nearly identical to that of its SLR contemporary, the XG-9, rather than the CL's gimmicky and sometimes inaccurate Leica-designed vertical cloth shutter. It ditched the CL's noisy, M5-derived pivoted-arm meter cell (with all its problems of wire fatigue at the pivot point) for a sophisticated off-the-film system (licensed from Olympus) that required no moving parts and could even adjust for changing light DURING the exposure. The CLE had a completely different rangefinder design, with a longer base length for greater accuracy and using the "moving telescope" principle for simpler adjustments compared to the CL's touchy-to-adjust, Leica-traditional "pivoted arm" rangefinder. The CLE even packed Minolta's sophisticated TTL autoflash system fully compatible with its X-series SLRs. The only "mystery" about the CLE was why it wasn't hugely more successful than its Wetzlar-cuckoo-clock predecessor...
Posted by: Ranger 9 | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 12:08 AM
May I give an honourable mention to Paul Franke and Reinhold Heidecke (now that they've definitively ridden off into the sunset?)
Posted by: James McDermott | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 12:12 AM
Heinz Waaske, the designer of Rollei 35 is absolutely someone to remember.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinz_Waaske
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=607932060 | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 02:26 AM
Eastman of Kodak fame? Or was he more business than actual design?
Posted by: Max | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 02:42 AM
József (Joseph) Petzval lived from 1807 to 1891. He designed his legendary portrait lens in around 1840.
Posted by: yz | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 02:53 AM
Perhaps the colani studios work with Canon should also be considered as the curves of the T90 design are, to my eye at least, a thing of great beauty. It's a genuine design classic and I don't think any other SLR has exploited modern materials as elegantly, indeed Canon seem to produce progressively more inelegant designs as the Eos range goes on.
Posted by: Barry Reid | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 03:38 AM
The Leica CL was first, then came the minolta CLE a few years later. The CL was a complete joint-venture between the Japanese and the then German company; it was built from 1973 to 1976, though Leitz scrapped it on their side because it cannibalised the sales figures of their M-line. In Germany [and probably some other markets] it was sold as Leica CL, in Japan as Leitz-Minolta CL [with a small 'm' as that was the brand logo at the time].
After Leitz' decision to not go on with the "consumer line" camera Minolta developed the CLE and sold it all over the world. I am not quite sure - not least because I sold of my Minolta literature [for the interested: Josef Scheibel and Dieter Gabler are the writers to look for] a few years back - if Minolta held on to the original Leitz-developed shutter or if they went with Copal.
Another Minolta-Leitz joint venture was the R3, essentially a Minolta XE-1 with added spot metering and motor drive capablity.
Posted by: Dierk | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 04:00 AM
Forget about the cameras, lets concentrate on the really important designers: John Tessar, Joe Biogon, Mary Summilux, and the all mighty Susan Noctilux.
Posted by: Richard Man | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 04:26 AM
Let's not forget Masahiko Fuketa. He was Chief Engineer at Nikon during the late 1950's and it was he who, along with input from noted graphic designer Yusaka Kamakura, designed the Nikon F. Its introduction kicked off what would become an SLR boom and marked the beginning of the end for the popularity of rangefinder cameras. There's a fascinating 2-part documentary on YouTube called "Designing the Nikon F" for anyone who might be interested.
~Ken
Posted by: Ken Dickinson | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 06:33 AM
What about Steve Jobs??!!!
Posted by: Ed O'Mahony | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 06:36 AM
Dieter Rams is one of the greatest product designers of the past 50 years. He designed the Braun Nizo cine camera and wrote the 10 commandments of design.
Posted by: Tim | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 08:25 AM
I'm going to have to go with Steve Sasson, the electrical engineer at Kodak who, with a couple of technicians and a new CCD, invented the digital camera in 1975.
Posted by: Doug Brewer | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 08:47 AM
The Magic of Edward Land.
Posted by: Danny Chatham | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 09:02 AM
I never really knew who designed the Argus C3, but have long thought it must have been SpongeBob SquarePants.
--Marc
Posted by: Marc Rochkind | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 09:19 AM
J'accuse Manfred Meinzer who ruined the R8 'design'.
Posted by: cb | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 09:32 AM
Walter Zapp (Minox)
Jacques Bolsey (Alpa and Bolsey)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 09:59 AM
Okay, so when I made my previous post at stupid-o'clock in the morning I missed the first featured comment that mentioned Masahiko Fuketa, which is why I made my own post about him. So, instead of that designer, how about Gustave Fassin, the engineer at International Radio Corporation who is generally credited with designing the Argus A (though it's his boss, Charles Veerschoor, whose name appears on the patent). The Argus A, along with Kodak's new daylight loadable film cartridge, played a huge part in making the 35mm format popular with those working-class Joes (and Janes) who couldn't afford a Leica.
Gustave Fassin also designed the even more popular and much better known Argus C-type.
~Ken
Posted by: Ken Dickinson | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 10:43 AM
Hubert Nerwin, Zeiss Ikon
http://www.zeisshistorica.org/Nerwin.html
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=632777405 | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 11:21 AM
Also, since I'm apparently determined to avoid actually working today: I agree that the M3 is achingly pretty, but "possibly the ... most significant, too"? Hmmm.
I don't think it's even the most significant Leica; the original Leica I, as the progenitor of small-format photography, has to rank higher, no?
I'd also rank one of the early practical SLRs, arguably a 1957-ish Pentax or the Nikon F, higher, as the progenitors of the SLR era.
Or perhaps the Juspin Konica. The what? The Juspin Konica. The first autofocus compact 35mm camera (1977), ushering in the era both of autofocus and of the modern point-and-shoot. Japanese camera industry folks still mark the Juspin Konica as a world-shaking development (it's often referenced in history stories on Canon, Nikon, Olympus et. al. web sites.)
But really, one of the early Kodak models (1888-ish) has to be the "most significant" title holder -- the first cameras ever made that were suitable for non-expert use, bringing photography to the masses, as the cliché goes.
The M3 is awesome, but it was the culmination of a dying breed, one that promptly passed firmly -- and very quickly -- into niche status very shortly after the M3 appeared.
Maybe this is a topic for another post, Mike! Or not :-)
Posted by: Eamon Hickey | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 02:01 PM
I think we also need a shoutout to Giorgetto Giugiaro, the "car designer of the century," who in addition to designing cars for Maserati, Lamborghini, and more or less everyone else, has designed SLR bodies for Nikon since the F3--he originated Nikon's "red flash" (which has nothing to do with strobes).
Posted by: Robin Dreyer | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 02:21 PM
Dear Doug,
I gotta disagree about Steve Sasson on several counts.
First, he didn't invent the digital camera. He built the first one (so far as we know), but he didn't build anything that many of us hadn't thought of and figured out the engineering on years earlier.
That's not to diminish his achievement, wich is historic and considerable. It's just not 'invention.'
Second, by no stretch of the imagination can his lab prototype be considered a camera design! And if it were, it would win no kudos from anyone.
Well, maybe fans of the Argus C3. I mean, if a brick can be considered attractive, think how much better a BOX is!
[g]
pax / Ctein
Posted by: ctein | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 03:15 PM
The image is great. What if the picture was taken by a Leica. We also need a picture of the designer of Nikon F vs Canon ... not possible I guess.
Posted by: Dennis Ng | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 08:03 PM
What about Kodak's Arthur Crapsey?
http://www.camerapedia.org/wiki/Arthur_H_Crapsey
Posted by: John Hufnagel | Tuesday, 29 September 2009 at 09:14 PM
Thanks, Mike. I just bought a used, semi-working CL, and it's nice to know who desgned it. And an interesting topic, generally.
Thanks, Ken, for Gustav Fassin. An Argus AF found at a flea market was my first fully manual camera. Until today, I thought it was all Mr. Veerschoor.
So why is it that even though I don't own a field camera, I've heard of Peter Gowland, Fred Picker and Ron Wisner?
However, anonymity seems the norm for industrial designers, except for a few superstars. Anyone know who designed their cell phone? (Exception: I heard of the designer of my Ericsson T610 from a few years ago (Erik Ahlgren), but only because Ericsson chose to promote it as a designer's vision. And it just occurred to me that his phone was my first digital camera.)
Posted by: robert e | Wednesday, 30 September 2009 at 12:57 AM
I've heard a rumor that both Hasselblad and it's ukrainian analogues were based on requisitioned german patent, probably Zeiss? Maybe "real" Hasselblads with central shutters were swedish-designed, but their film magazines and their outer appearance still remained the same... So could there be anyone in the shade of Victor Hasselblad?
Posted by: Pardik | Wednesday, 30 September 2009 at 09:31 AM
If we want to trace the portable format back further, George Eastman probably deserves a mention having kicked the whole thing off with the Kodak.
Posted by: Martin Doonan | Wednesday, 30 September 2009 at 10:20 AM