The leading photo sharing site, flickr.com, charts the popularity of the cameras used by its membership. Recently the Apple iPhone has jumped into a virtual tie for first place with the Canon XTi. Furthermore, flickr states on its "Camera Finder" page that it can only detect the camera used about 2/3rds of the time, and that, therefore, cameraphones are under-represented on the graphs. Yikes.
(Click on the image to see it larger.)
(Thanks to Dennis Ng)
Camera phones have been outselling actual cameras for a number of years already, and the proportion now is something like 8:1. At the same time the cameras have become much better. At events and tourist spots here, phone cam users already way outnumber people with a "real" camera.
Forget any argument between film and digital, or between P&S and SLR cameras. The dedicated camera itself is becoming a niche. Wrote a bit about it here: http://janneinosaka.blogspot.com/2009/02/your-last-camera.html
Posted by: Janne | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 02:41 AM
Flikr has always seemed to me to be the ideal outlet for camera phones - people snapping their daily lives with the device to hand in a low-res, web-friendly format.
Posted by: Martin Doonan | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 02:51 AM
I'm sure the iPhone is fine in its way, but I do think the reason it's so popular on Flickr is the fact that it's really easy to upload directly from the phone. No "normal" camera can do that, with the exception of a few wifi-enabled ones.
Posted by: Gustaf Erikson | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 03:20 AM
Really sad
Posted by: Peter | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 03:31 AM
For the comparison to be meaningful, either the iPhone figures would have to be broken into 3G and 3Gs figures, or the XTi and XSi counts should be added together.
Also, just because "cameraphones" in general are under-represented, it doesn't mean the same applies to iPhones in particular.
Posted by: John Carney | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 05:05 AM
I use Flickr and enjoy posting and looking at posted photographs...I have recently noticed many iPhone snaps, and they can be quite good. There is an app that some use that makes the photo look like a polaroid print. The photo has a border that looks like a scanned polaroid. It struck me that this may be the digital equivalent people have been waiting for. I do not have an iphone,but I want one just to have this app! Yes I know that I can put a polaroid frame around any photo I take, but this seems to do it for you...
Posted by: William Perez | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 05:18 AM
One again it is proven that the best camera is the one you have with you.
Posted by: Jon Bloom | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 05:39 AM
Interesting graph. People want to share their decisive moments. Whaddayaknow.
I want an upload to Flickr button on my 5D2 too.
Posted by: Pascal Scheffers | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 05:47 AM
Companies that depend on point-and-shoots for their livelihoods (or at least, a good chunk of their revenue) are not happy with that graph.
Posted by: Peter | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 07:30 AM
The hoopla in the camera world is the "convergence" of video and still cameras. The real convergence is cameraphones with every other type of camera, especially compacts.
Posted by: Ted Johnson | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 07:33 AM
If the iPhone is only one camera, but the Canon EOSes are three or more, then the stats are too screwy to mean anything. No doubt that mobile phone/cameras are taking over for casual snapshots, though.
--Marc
Posted by: Marc Rochkind | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 07:39 AM
Hard to underestimate the sheer fun of being able to shoot and email a photo in one simple operation - from damn near anywhere. I recently used mine when I witnessed a motor vehicle accident where one party failed to stop and leave ID (her subsequent arrest was affected within a half hour). "Interesting" implications legally, and for law enforcement generally...
All in all, it's about shooting 'unserious' fotos. Spur of the moment stuff, even street shooting. It sure ain't art, but it's fun.
Posted by: cw | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 08:42 AM
The new iPhone 3GS camera -- the one that lets you tap to focus and (more importantly) set the exposure -- is actually a *really good* cameraphone.
Yes, I realize that a "really good" cameraphone is still, at best, a marginal camera. But, it's also in my pocket at all times, and it's good enough to fill that niche, at least for me.
Posted by: John | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 09:42 AM
I think they mean "many cameraphones don't write EXIF data". The iPhone does, so it's not underreported, just other cameraphones.
Posted by: Vince | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 09:53 AM
Logical... the best camera is the one you have with you. Couple that to the ease of uploading with an iPhone to Flickr, always & anywhere. And there you have the recipe for being the most popular cam on Flickr. Oh and don't forget that rebel xti & xsi are seen as 2 different cameras. So I don't see why say yikes. For me the rebels are yikes ;)
Posted by: Bob van Ooik | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 10:10 AM
I'm curious about those iPhone usage jumps. There was a big jump in early June and a smaller one in late April, if I'm reading the chart correctly.
I guess it's no surprise that low and mid range system cameras dominate, and that this means SLR's, but I'm impressed by how much, and by the predictability of the shutterbug market, and by how skewed toward Canon.
On the other hand, we are probably looking at follower behavior as well (as discussed in a recent TOP post), where what is popular with a group is anointed "best" and becomes even more popular, combined with camera system design and marketing.
Posted by: robert e | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 10:25 AM
Is that counting just the original iPhone, or all generations of the product? If it's the latter, this seems like a pretty meaningless comparison - every new (often very marginally different) generation of the same DSLR lineage is counted as a distinct camera (or at least that's how the labeling makes it look), so for a fair comparison every time they put out a slightly different updated iPhone it should be a distinct camera. I realize this may not be possible, but without it it's really that much harder to know what to make of this.
Of course, if it is just the first-generation iPhone they're counting, that's even more impressive.
Posted by: Benjamin R. George | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 10:32 AM
I'm not sure I would consider the 'iPhone camera' an actual Camera....
Posted by: JeffH | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 10:55 AM
Erm, why yikes? Remember that discussion about DMD's and similar stuff? People use what's good enough for them. If that's camera phones, well, that's a choice.
Posted by: erlik | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 11:54 AM
We're getting them this Friday, and it will definitely be more likely to be in my pocket than my K10D.
Posted by: Lou Doench | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 12:27 PM
I'm sure that 15 years ago the number of people shooting with point-and-shoots and processing at Walmart vastly outnumbered those shooting with Nikon F5's, EOS 1's and buying pro-processing combined. It was ever thus. Flickr is, for the most part, a giant electronic shoebox in the sky, no?
Ben Marks
Posted by: Benjamin Marks | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 12:38 PM
Clearly the modern equivalent of the point-and-shoot.
Here is a way to modify one for "macro" photography.
Posted by: Randolph | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 01:04 PM
My wife has an iphone, and I gotta say...it takes some pretty damn good photos. It's not a leica obviously, but it works very well for snapshots IMO.
Posted by: RP | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 02:15 PM
Peter: except maybe Canon, who also happen to dominate the P&S market as well as the flickr P&S chart. But lets note that flickr use may not parallel camera sales.
Benjamin: My understanding is that the chart shows the past year, which means the 3Gs doesn't enter until the end of that last big surge, which does coincide with a drastic price cut on the older iphone. The $99 promotion for older iphones was only for new accounts, which could explain the surge (new users rather than upgraders).
Maybe we should not conflate flickr with the camera market too much. It makes sense that more uploads come from popular devices with easy access (like iphone) and (from my sense of flickr, anyway) the more clubby "serious amateurs" who seem to gravitate to popular brand name systems with easy entry, clear upgrade paths and conspicuous "pro" usage. I assume that P&S users are spread out among many online sharing sites, and that many of them are more print oriented by habit (from film days), and so are more likely to use more print oriented services.
However, I have to admit that the chart does reflect two trends I see at tourist spots around here: more cell phone snappers, and entire families equipped with SLRs (kids with small, dads with large, moms with a mid-size or a superzoom). My random, unscientific observations suggest that Canon and Sony/Minolta are the more family-friendly systems.
Posted by: robert e | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 02:16 PM
"Clearly the modern equivalent of the point-and-shoot."
Or the modern equivalent of the Polaroid, in that both provide instant results that are easy to share with friends. I've seen some iPhone work that's really pretty good. You've just gotta work within the limitations of your tools.
Flickr's Camera Finder tool uses the EXIF data embedded in uploaded JPG files. Most camera manufacturers (like Canon) take pains to make sure their cameras are easy to distinguish. I don't know if Apple has changd their identifiers for different iPhone revisions.
Some generic camera components, like those used in many cell phones, have equally generic EXIF tags that are not helpful for this purpose. I think that's what they're getting at in the when they say cellphone cameras are under-counted.
Posted by: Bryan C | Wednesday, 26 August 2009 at 02:58 PM
I can imagine if Flickr had been around at the height of the Polaroid, the number of Polaroids may well have out numbered those from SLR's.
Mobile phone images are definitely the new Polaroids and there is some great work being done on them.
Especially the iPhones
Posted by: Phill | Thursday, 27 August 2009 at 12:35 AM
" I assume that P&S users are spread out among many online sharing sites, and that many of them are more print oriented by habit (from film days), and so are more likely to use more print oriented services."
I can´t help to agree with robert e. I mean, who would buy a DSLR just to post pictures on the web? Why not go all the way and get yourself a Leica and a film scanner? I´m sorry, but I guess uploading pictures from your cellphone just makes much more sense.
That being said, if we add up the figures for all the Canon DSLRs in the chart, it´s but fair to wonder just how many "DSLR owners-Flicker users" actually stopped to think about it.
Posted by: Juan Rizzo | Thursday, 27 August 2009 at 01:25 AM
HCB, or whatever you call him, I think would have used an iPhone, or similar, for his decisive moments had he been around today.
Posted by: Peter in Bangkok | Thursday, 27 August 2009 at 06:33 AM
Ease of availability, mass sales, easy to use and being an internet device is contributing to the fame of iphone on flickr. It has nothing to do with the cam quality or anything else. Its just that people have more access to it and playing with its cam's abilities. Nice try though...
Thanks for sharing Mike
Posted by: rca | Saturday, 05 September 2009 at 12:55 AM