Okay, we can all go home now. Latvian photographer Ivars Gravlejs has covered them all. All the rules. There are 78 of them. But wait! How can I remember 78 rules? I can't remember 78 of anything. I can't remember 78 former classmates' names, or 78 of the meals that I've eaten, or 78 of the women I've slept with*. How can I remember 78 Photography Rules for Complete Idiots?
(One slight problem though...the "wrong" photograph in #47 is a great shot.)
(Thanks to Rachel)
*Don't disturb me. I live in a dreamworld of my own imagining, and I'm happy in here.
59 is my favourite
Posted by: Dan | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 12:48 PM
In my opinion, #78 "wrong" is the better than #78 "right". I'm not sure I look like #78 "wrong", but I sure feel that way!
Posted by: Ted Johnson | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 01:15 PM
Cute. I've taken pictures like the wrong version of #74...
Posted by: Eric Ford | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 01:21 PM
Funny. You're right, several of the "wrong" photographs are more interesting than the "right" photographs. I'm rather fond of #54, myself.
Posted by: MBS | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 01:24 PM
"#58 It's better not to photograph if you are drunk"
Well that does it I quit! ;)
Posted by: Infamous J | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 01:32 PM
I laughed out loud at 45 - I recently passed my camera to a (admittedly flakey) friend's mother, who broke that rule: "When you photography try to look in the viewfinder, not the lens".
Those are fantastic. I've closed the page, and I'm still chuckling.
Posted by: Aaron | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 01:42 PM
I think he's wrong in a lot of them...I only had to get to number 7 before I had a problem. Maybe the key word here is "idiot." If you're an idiot, the chosen photo is the better one. If you're not an idiot, the "wrong" one is somewhat more likely to be correct.
I did kind of like the inane bikini girl photo with the big fingerprint on it. It was like one of those symbol dealios.
Posted by: John Camp | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 01:44 PM
Actually there are quite a few of the wrongs that I like better.
Posted by: Jim Meeks | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 02:01 PM
I'm secretly hoping it's a hoax, for #36 is a tad unbelievable :)
Posted by: Ludovic | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 02:32 PM
If that's what I think it is, the magazine has an... interesting name.
Posted by: erlik | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 02:32 PM
rule 22. Why do onions need sidelight?
I like my onions lightly backlit with garlic.
Posted by: jamin | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 03:10 PM
Mike, I would have thought you'd go for 77: "Try to avoid from too high saturation".
Posted by: Bojidar | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 03:14 PM
is it bad that I like a lot of his "wrong" pictures better? or that I do a lot of the things he says not to? 78 rules is a lot. f/1.2 and be there is about all I've ever needed.
Posted by: matt | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 03:16 PM
There has to be a lot more -- Like don't use a flash at a concert, etc. if your 300 feet away from the people singing.
If you haven't made at least one of these so called mistakes on purpose then you are not breaking the rules.
Posted by: Carl Leonardi | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 03:44 PM
I give the guy credit for trying, but that's hilarious.
Posted by: Miserere | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 03:46 PM
No. 58....
Well, I have taken many fine photos while drunk. The only problem is looking after the camera and flash all evening.
I know what I need. A nice, compact, quick to use camera, about 12 Megapixels.
In other words, a Drunken Moment Camera.
Posted by: Roger Bradbury | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 03:47 PM
His photos are even funnier-- http://ivarsgravlejs.com/
Posted by: Carl Leonardi | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 03:49 PM
I got you beat: I can remember *all* the women I've slept with!
I think the most important of the rules is the one about photographing onions in sidelight. The number of times I've messed that up!
Posted by: Eolake Stobblehouse | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 04:05 PM
It was the onions that made me lose it.
More seriously, this would be great fodder for discussion about when - and when not - to follow rules.
Posted by: Rana | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 04:24 PM
As Ansel Adams usually ignored Rule 30, does that mean that he was a complete idiot?
Posted by: David Brookes | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 04:45 PM
Yes, it reveals the usually unrevealed: the presence and influence of the photographer upon the subject, and, hence, the photograph. Well seen!
Posted by: Rod S. | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 04:55 PM
A funny tongue in cheek site. I like 58 as well as Mike's choice.
Alex
Posted by: Alex Vesey | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 05:37 PM
20 FTW, though the comments themselves are funnier. People get awfully serious about jokes.
Posted by: Robert | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 05:44 PM
Wonderful. My preference is split about 75%/25% in favor of the "wrong" ones. Might just make a project for myself (to make 78 'wrong' photos).
Posted by: Alex Glickman | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 05:45 PM
#58....aahhhh, all this time nobody told me.
Posted by: Marty | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 05:52 PM
Hard to argue with # 20 ...
Posted by: David B | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 06:15 PM
Re: 47. Obviously he's not a Freidlander fan.
I kind of liked the wrong one in 5 as well (just the head, with a lot of the room above it), but that might just be my nostalgia for the Eugene Richards workshop exercise, where we had to sit across from our subject, and shoot a roll of film, without repeating ourselves.
Posted by: sevres-babylone | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 07:04 PM
I'm usually prepared when I come to TOP, knowing it's not a comedy site and I can let my guard down - but I almost spit my soda out on my monitor reading these. # 45: When you photograph try to look in the viewfinder not in the lens" CLASSIC!
Posted by: Jerred Zegelis | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 07:15 PM
I like 36 myself...
Posted by: Ricardo | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 07:25 PM
Good one.
Hard to argue with #20, though I'm sure there's a a horde of art students out there aching to prove him wrong even as we speak.
Posted by: Janne | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 07:31 PM
Hey - anyone check out the guy's site yet? It's absolutely hilarious. Check this out:
http://www.ivarsgravlejs.com/pages/noviny011.htm
Posted by: Jerred Zegelis | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 07:33 PM
Rules that I have decided do not apply to me:
1, 4, 5, 7, 13, 16, 17, 19, 23, 27, 33, 39, 47, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 60, 63, 64, 68, 77, 78.
This must mean I'm not a complete idiot... right?
Posted by: Jeff Berardi | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 08:33 PM
No, no, #52 :)
"If you want to photograph the flower, it's better to photograph the flower.
Posted by: Allen George | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 08:35 PM
58: It's better not to photograph if you are drunk.
Mike,
Writers seem to be a drinking lot. Famous writer and famous drunk are almost synonyms.
Are there well known photographers that are also known for their hard drinking?
-Tom-
Posted by: Tom V | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 08:51 PM
Actually, I think those are very good 'guidelines' for the vast majority of pictures. Obviously he was being tongue-in-cheek and trying to show the so-called 'rules' have to be broken when you are trying to be creative.
JMR
Posted by: John Roias | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 09:15 PM
I love quirky humor.
Also: useful illustrations if you were giving a friend a lesson in photography basics.
Posted by: Lubo | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 09:19 PM
Most of these are crap! Most of the "Right" shots are also wrong. There is a reason why it is called "Portrait".
Posted by: Ron Peters | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 09:33 PM
You do realize that this guy is something of a prankster (AKA art student)
"For two years “Useful advices for photographers” has been published in weekly Latvian cultural newspaper “Kulturas Forums”.
With this project I got my master’s degree in FAMU - Academy of Performing Arts in Prague"
He also perpetrated a prank on a newspaper in Prague makes the French art student story
of a couple days ago pale in comparison.
http://www.ivarsgravlejs.com/pages/noviny001.htm
Posted by: hugh crawford | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 11:01 PM
78 women? Impressive. Ever find "the one"?
Posted by: Mike | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 11:33 PM
"or 78 of the women I've slept with"
If you took all the girls I knew when I was single
And brought them all together for one night
You know they'd never match my sweet little imagination
And everything looks worse in black and white
I agree with you, #47 is a great shot. Who is he writing for - someone in grade school? Don't do this, or I'll take away your camera. He writes like we're all wayward children.
Posted by: misha | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 11:41 PM
I think #77 is excellent simply because I see the two reversed so many times in online photography tutorials and examples.
Posted by: Matthew Miller | Sunday, 05 July 2009 at 11:41 PM
"This must mean I'm not a complete idiot... right?"
Right!!
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 12:41 AM
It was humorous, but not nearly as humorous as all of the comments here which took it seriously.
Posted by: Dave Kee | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 12:52 AM
Robert - I know! Clearly some people are incapable of reading things except in the most literal way possible. I mean, he even posted a note at the beginning that it was a joke!
Posted by: Rana | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 01:00 AM
#47 betters the comparable Friedlander, and to my horror, even suggests a whole genre of shadow interacting with the subject photos still to be made.
wrong isn't always right, right isn't always wrong, and the examples of idiocy are quite inspiring. Great link.
scott
Posted by: scott kirkpatrick | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 01:06 AM
had to cough while reading the website name, gawno means crap or excrements in russian. I am a native russian speaker, but so are many where this guy lives, so calling his website "Gawno Magazine" is quite a brave statement
Posted by: - | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 01:26 AM
If you want photos of those interesting looking eastern european student girlies this is much quicker than trawling flickr.
But the best bit came at the bottom - a link to a page of old "electro buses" (in the UK we called them trolley buses), great stuff!
Posted by: Robin P | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 01:38 AM
I never knew that was the best way to photograph sausage!
Posted by: Jared | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 02:04 AM
I'll bet none of you will ever look at a sausage again without thinking "rule 36".
Cheers,
Colin
Posted by: Colin Work | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 07:37 AM
Just when you thought there was nothing educational on the internet.
Posted by: Robert Roaldi | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 08:09 AM
Very amusing!
Posted by: Jason | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 08:41 AM
This becomes even funnier if you know what means the name of the web site "Gawno" in most Eastern-European languages...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feces
Posted by: Dibutil Ftalat | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 09:08 AM
* My memory tops out at around 40-45.... You don't have to remember LAST names, right?
Posted by: Derek Stanton | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 10:14 AM
Mike, here's a #47, one of my favorite photos of all time, a Friedlander:
http://www.artnet.com/artwork/425951269/396/lee-friedlander-las-vegas.html
Please don't post this link until after you and I can buy vintage prints for ourselves!
Posted by: James Tolley | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 10:35 AM
I can't tell you how many times #36 has been a problem for me... Now I know what to do, and I won't eat the sausage out of frustration!
Posted by: Mark | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 10:41 AM
no 47 superb photo..!!!!
Posted by: george | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 11:25 AM
Here's something that might make a good topic for a future post:
http://www.popphoto.com/Features/30-Photo-Friendly-Cities
I know, I violated my vow not to visit this site again today.
Posted by: farshore | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 01:55 PM
Er, perhaps there should be a No. 79:
Do not photograph when you are very, very tired. Or make comments here.
My comment about No. 58 should of course read that what I really need is a Drunken Moment Digital.
Posted by: Roger Bradbury | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 03:12 PM
The most important one is not there!
"Not breaking any photography rules"
Posted by: Maarten B. | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 03:34 PM
I thought it was a nice weird and funny link... :-)
Posted by: Margouillat | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 03:51 PM
Just one thing I find a little bit sad about this piece of satire.
If I went to a show of photography in some prestigious gallery I would not be at all surprised to find the two images in example number one hanging on the wall!
By the way, when did he add the "Alarma! Don't take it serious, please?"
Posted by: Jim Richardson | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 05:18 PM
This was actually pretty funny. Lots of classics in that list!
Then I tried to remember 78 classmates I slept with and it was not so funny anymore.
Posted by: Cyril | Monday, 06 July 2009 at 11:21 PM
jamin wrote:
"rule 22. Why do onions need sidelight?
I like my onions lightly backlit with garlic."
If you backlight onions, your lens waters; keep the juices away by sidelighting
Posted by: Andrew | Tuesday, 07 July 2009 at 02:28 AM
I like #72
"If you are photograph the nude, make sure the clothes are off"
Posted by: David | Tuesday, 07 July 2009 at 08:12 AM
The Sausage Rule #36 is revelatory. I now know where I've been going wrong all these years.
Posted by: Simon C | Tuesday, 07 July 2009 at 11:54 AM
wait, 16 both are wrong on axis light sucks! and 18 the damn apple is upside down for crying out loud lol! more later i'm sure!
Posted by: John Taylor | Thursday, 09 July 2009 at 02:08 AM
oh, its ok he's corrected himself in 22…
Posted by: John Taylor | Thursday, 09 July 2009 at 02:09 AM
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
how can I write this without looking like a complete loser, idiot, or similar.
I actually quite like most of the "wrong" pictures more than the "right" pictures.
That being said, I guess I need to look somewhere else and start knitting as a hobby.
Posted by: Iñaki | Sunday, 12 July 2009 at 10:03 AM