I'm sure no one reading this blog ever forwards crazy urban legends and hoax stories along to their friends...and I'm sure you know to check such rumors at Snopes.com if someone else sends one of them to you.
So, have you ever wondered what the story is behind Snopes? I was (really) sitting in the barber shop the other day, and I happened to pick up a Reader's Digest (really!) and came across this article about David and Barbara Mikkelson, the indefatigable researchers behind Snopes.com.
I learned from the article that Snopes and the Mikkelsons are responsible for a few coinages themselves, one of which is the now oft-encountered fauxtography, meaning a fake picture intended as a hoax. (Snopes even has a category for "Fauxtos" on the site directory.)
The one I really like is slacktivism, the act of passing on a cautionary email supposedly to raise awareness or warn or educate others without bothering to first find out whether it's true. Entirely too much of that going on.
Featured Comment by eric s: "I suspect that the image is from Why Paint Cats, not the other way around.
"I think one is a sendup of the other, but one can never be too sure."
Featured Comment by Chris Crawford: "I actually took an Art History class in college back in the late '90s when I was working on my BFA that used Why Cats Paint as one of the textbooks! We had to write a paper comparing the way that book described the cats' painting and the way that our other textbook (Johnathan Fineberg's Art Since 1940: Strategies of Being) presented modernist paintings."
Mike, I think that picture is actually from "Why Paint Cats." This is the even-more-brilliant sequel to "Why Cats Paint." It is not only a marvelous lampoon of art-critic-speak, it's some damned fine Photoshop work.
Posted by: Robin Dreyer | Wednesday, 13 May 2009 at 05:33 PM
Best cat picture I ever saw.
bd
Posted by: bobdales | Wednesday, 13 May 2009 at 06:38 PM
"Why Cats Paint" is my favorite art book of all time.
Posted by: Archer Sully | Wednesday, 13 May 2009 at 08:02 PM
My condolences to the cat!
Posted by: Bryce Lee | Wednesday, 13 May 2009 at 09:35 PM
Snopes also has a message board that discusses pictures before the stories become part of the main site.
http://message.snopes.com/forumdisplay.php?s=cbf26c3a948d1ab32c27ddf18ba45249&f=10
There is a brief approval process before you can post so the quality is higher than most other message boards.
Posted by: Sam | Wednesday, 13 May 2009 at 11:05 PM
Fauxtography's been around for a while. I think we all remember the occasion when vicious pinko-liberal Photoshoppers erased the cover page of a certain copy of 'Advanced Quantum Mechanics' and substituted a rather poorly executed 'My Little Goat'.
Posted by: James McDermott | Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 01:03 AM
That's Ctein's cat.
;-)
Posted by: charlie d | Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 09:00 AM
I don't think you are quite right about slacktivism. It is more about doing some extremely minimal thing - like responding to an internet poll or petition - and thinking that you are making a difference with minimal cost to yourself.
My favorite snopism is "glurge" - those sickeningly sweet cloying emails about how puppies are like Jesus.
Posted by: KeithB | Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 11:07 AM
After picking up "Why Paint Cats" at the gift shop at the Renwick Gallery where it was prominently displayed and completely entranced me I didn't realize it was a "send up" until I got home...
- Tim
Posted by: Tim Medley | Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 11:37 AM
I wasn't familiar with the term "slacktivism" and must say it is a revelation! I intend to use it profusely. Thank you!
Posted by: Vince | Friday, 15 May 2009 at 03:55 PM