Starting tomorrow morning, I'm going to be doing a daily "countdown" of the current T.O.P. Recommended Cameras. I'll begin with #10 and count down to #1.
Obviously, any such list should be considered highly subjective: just one writer's take on the current state of the market. I almost opted to simply call it "T.O.P. Ten Cameras We Like." However, that list would actually be different: it would be more idiosyncratic and more subjective. The upcoming list will be tailored to recommendations: cameras in the market that we think are particularly good choices as purchases.
You will think that at least two of my choices are cop-outs, for reasons that will become clear once you see them. I consider them more in the category of "correctives," to counteract an impression that is now widespread on the web. I shall 'splain, when the time comes.
There is only one film camera left on the list. Perhaps time for a separate list?
See you tomorrow.
Featured Comment by Gordon Lewis: "I already disagree with your choices. (Heh, heh....)"
Featured Comment by [another] Mike: "Time to settle in while Mike prepares himself for 10 days of verbal abuse at the hands of his readers."
I look forward to it Mike! Your best-of lists are always thoughtful and entertaining, plus it's fun seeing all the feathers getting ruffled.
Posted by: Player | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 05:13 PM
What's that I hear?
Could it be the sound of a large economy-size can of worms being opened?
Oh boy ... this is going to be fun!
Posted by: Kent | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 06:13 PM
Sounds good - and should stir up some interesting discussion. Don't forget to tell us who the recommendation is aimed at, and why.
Posted by: Chris | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 06:37 PM
I don't disagree with your choices yet -- that has to wait until you reveal the first one -- but I do disagree with your structure. When you reveal your #10 choice, we'll all think, 'Oh, that's just a foolish mistake, anybody could make that,' but we won't be able to see how bad the mistake is for ten days, by which time the people with shorter attention spans, like me, will have forgotten how bad #10 was. I think you should list all ten to begin with, and then countdown the detailed explanations. That way, we'll be able to discuss this arrant idiocy as it's in progress, rather than having to wait ten days and do it all at once. I was shocked, by the way, by your choice of the A900 as #1. That was one I never would have guessed.
JC
Posted by: John Camp | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 06:41 PM
Mike,
Please wait a week so we can organize a pool!!
bd
Posted by: bobdales | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 07:08 PM
Unless the Nikon F5 and the Agfa Clack (Insert alternative favorite/current/dream combination here) are the top cameras I will stop visiting your site. So there. Take that.
Posted by: David Boyce | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 07:14 PM
"I was shocked, by the way, by your choice of the A900 as #1. That was one I never would have guessed."
Wrong, Bestseller-breath. It's #5.
Oops....
Mike
Posted by: Mike Johnston | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 07:19 PM
And the Voigtlander Bessa III? Really? Really?
Posted by: Chad Thompson | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 07:58 PM
Well, two of my most used and beloved cameras to date were bougth according to your recomendation at PT: Wista DXII and Contax Aria.
After all these years, I still use them with pleasure.
Helcio
Posted by: Helcio J Tagliolatto | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 08:00 PM
Film camera? My guess Zeiss Ikon. (Your review is right at the top of a google search)
Posted by: EmmJay | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 08:53 PM
Mike. Not that damned PENTAX LX again!
Posted by: paul bailey | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 09:18 PM
The only film camera left on your list HAS to be a Leica M6 (or MP, or some other M variant). Please let it be so! :)
Posted by: David Teo Boon Hwee | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 09:49 PM
...and let the games begin.
Neil
Posted by: Neil Gilchrist | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 10:41 PM
Time to settle in while Mike prepares himself for 10 days of verbal abuse at the hands of his readers.
Posted by: Mike | Sunday, 12 April 2009 at 11:33 PM
I think the separation factor shouldn't be film & digital, but real men's and girlie cameras. Clearly, no self-respecting possessor of a Y chromosome is going to aspire to any non-tumescent rig. So nothing with pancake lenses that isn't ring-fenced for the Ladies, please. I may put out several vertebrae carrying that D3 and 14-24mm Viagrascope, but no-one's going to accuse me of being good on a dance floor.
Posted by: James McDermott | Monday, 13 April 2009 at 12:15 AM
Even that f*****g Flowers wouldn't have picked the A900 as #1! Let 'er rip Mike...as Kent said, this is going to be fun.
Rod
Posted by: Rod Graham | Monday, 13 April 2009 at 01:25 AM
I'm especially interested in the "low end" recommendations, I already have too many big cameras.
In particular the pocket sized, durable as a hockey puck, raw capable, lowish noise in the dark, wide angle equipped model. Swing out LCD, and reasonable video just in case.
Extra points for availability in funny colors like lime green or orange that make the photographer look like a harmless idiot.
Seems like there is an ocean of "not quite what I was looking for" stuff out there.
I'd settle for just a swing out LCD and reasonably small, but there doesn't seem to be anything on the market at all
Posted by: hugh crawford | Monday, 13 April 2009 at 02:48 AM
It is a brave task you attempt, Mike. I know you'll be bold in your choices.
"The opposite of bravery is not cowardice but conformity." - Robert Anthony
Posted by: John Roberts | Monday, 13 April 2009 at 04:22 AM
"Time to settle in while Mike prepares himself for 10 days of verbal abuse at the hands of his readers."
I'll make the popcorn ;-)
Posted by: Peter | Monday, 13 April 2009 at 07:14 AM
One large soda and a tub of popcorn, please.
Posted by: Riley | Monday, 13 April 2009 at 11:08 AM