Japan Exposures is offering pre-converted Contax G lenses adapted to Leica M mount.
The Contax G1 and G2 were premium AF viewfinder cameras with excellent Zeiss lenses. Unfortunately, they arrived on the scene just prior to the dawning of the digital age, which subsequently drove the company (Kyocera) from the field. What this has meant is that the fine Zeiss Contax G lenses have been effectively orphaned, and now sell cheaply because of their near-useless lensmount.
A few intrepid individuals have had their G lenses adapted for Leica M mount, and now Japan Exposures is offering pre-converted lenses for direct sale. They remove the optical cell from the G mount housing and add a rangefinder-coupled focusing helical and 39mm screwmount; then a simple LTM-to-M adapter makes the lenses usable on M-mount cameras. There are a few handling oddities, such as the fact that the apertures don't have click-stops.
Why pay a lot of money for this when there are perfectly good alternatives in native M-mount? Don't ask us. Maybe you have a particular fondness for one of the G lenses? Maybe you just want to be different? Idiosyncratic reasons aside, Leica shooters might be particularly interested in the rectilinear Zeiss Hologon, a modern iteration of a rare classic design that was one of the glories of the G system—and that functions as a true 21mm-equivalent on the M8. See the website for pictures, and prices.
I note in the photograph the Hexar rangefinder. I have one of those original Hexar "P&S" rangefinder "style" ones, AF's, with a fixed 35mm f/2 lense. One of the best, if not the best, lense I have ever experienced in 35mm format.
It quiet mode (with an autowind function) was barely audible to the person using it.
But alas, the little guy is non-functional. Would love to get it repaired.
Posted by: Jay Moynihan | Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 11:20 AM
Jay,
Or, you could buy the same lens in LTM--that is, if you're feeling flush.
Item #120366429383
Mike J.
Posted by: Michael Johnston | Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 11:34 AM
Nice new life for these superb lenses...
P.S. I believe Konica-Minolta still offers repairs for Hexars.
Posted by: Hexar | Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 11:40 AM
Man, I was so keen on the Hexar (maybe AF) back in the day, but I did not have money. This is the kind of camera I want to see in the digital era. Not the specifics, but the compromise-less spirit of it.
Posted by: Eolake Stobblehouse | Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 01:27 PM
Google says:
68 000 Japanese yen = 765.68 U.S. dollars
That's the price for the 28mm lens, converted. (If I'm reading it right!)
Somehow I assumed that "a lot of money for this" in leica-land would have meant that the decimal point was a bit further right... not spectacularly cheap like the G system itself now, but not outlandish for the conversion you're getting - it's a whole new mount, focus cam and all. At least, I presume they are RF coupled, although I'm surprised the FAQ doesn't mention this.
Posted by: improbable | Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 02:15 PM
"At least, I presume they are RF coupled, although I'm surprised the FAQ doesn't mention this."
Improbable,
I'll find out and add it to the post.
Mike J.
Posted by: Michael Johnston | Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 04:16 PM
Improbable,
The lensmounts are indeed rf-coupled, which I've added to the post.
Mike J.
Posted by: Michael Johnston | Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 05:34 PM
Photography must certainly be among the top three arenas for male fetishism, right up there with fly fishing and...well...
Posted by: Ken Tanaka | Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 06:40 PM
I am currently having a 28mm lens converted to M mount by these folks. They also serve as a middleman with a good conversion shop -- the source of those converted G lenses. I believe that the actual conversion is done by Mr. Miyazaki of Hayata Camera Labs. Japan Exposures (formerly Megapearls) is acting as a middleman, handling translation and shipping outside Japan, which Hayata does not do. I have had a 45 G-Sonnar converted to LTM this way (had to find my own middleman . . . several folks whom I do not know did me favors to make this happen) and the lens (which is rf coupled and which has, as Mike noted, a friction ring (rather than click-stops) for the aperture) functions well. For me, the "why" of it was/is that I like the Contax-G lenses and wanted to use them with different cameras. It is worth noting that Hayata offers all sorts of interesting conversions to M-mount, not just Contax G lenses, for those interested in that sort of thing, including lenses from certain fixed lens rangefinders. I am sure that Japan Exposures would be happy to help out with conversion-translation etc.
Ben Marks
Posted by: Benjamin Marks | Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 08:19 PM
I just experienced a major brainstorm. Why not pick up a beautiful Contax G2 along with a Ex+ 28 Biogen? I just paid $550 for both. Saved myself just over $200 compared to buying the converted lens alone. I think the G2 is one of the all time great cameras and after having sellers remorse for 4 years now I just adopted another. :)
Posted by: EmmJay | Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 08:49 PM
Probably not suitable for this site but I found it very strange -- the site said that it cannot be used as L mount and also it cannot be used for RD1. Both require send in camera to adjust and is not practical outside Japan. Is that true in general that L mount and RD1 will have focus error?
Posted by: Dennis Ng | Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 11:24 PM
I have no NEED for the Hologon, but I *WANT* one.... sigh... pocket book says otherwise though.
Posted by: Richard Man | Monday, 26 January 2009 at 02:16 AM
These type of superbly skilled and inventive individuals adapting and converting add real passion to the field of photography and real choice. Most of us like to 'fiddle about' with gear for our individual needs (I made my own bellows lens shade because they are extremely expensive items) and occassionally a brave soul makes their fiddling/adaptation commercially. Long live men in sheds.
My opinion on the G-system 45mm in particular is that it is one of the finest performing pieces of glass ever made and worth the price of a Leica body to suit. I'm more than happy with my Contax hybrid system but as the electronics age I'd be very tempted to have a manual 45 on a Voigtlander (If I had a nice M Leica it would probably be the only camera I could afford to kit out if I sold all of my existing cameras, and it's not worth that to me. Mr. Miyazaki and his like are helping to keep quality more affordable - fantastic.
Posted by: Mark Walker | Monday, 26 January 2009 at 06:30 AM
I received a note from the folks at Japan Exposres clarifying that MS Optical (Miyazaki) and Hayata are two separate entities. MS performs the conversions, and Hayata is the main domestic reseller of his good and services. Although this is probably not germane to the discussion above, I wanted to correct my factual error in my prior post.
If anyone is interested in the results from this converted lens, I am happy to make some test pictures available; however, I am uncertain what Mike's rules are for posting e-mail addresses on this sort of thing.
Best regards,
Ben Marks
Posted by: Benjamin Marks | Monday, 26 January 2009 at 11:16 AM
a new Contax digital body will be great
Posted by: erick | Tuesday, 27 January 2009 at 02:02 AM
erick,
Not likely, though, since, as I mentioned, Contax is no longer in business.
A pity--
Mike J.
Posted by: Michael Johnston | Tuesday, 27 January 2009 at 04:32 AM
Mike
I know but I don't know exactly which company actually own the name , and maybe ... :-)
Posted by: erick | Wednesday, 28 January 2009 at 12:57 AM
Not my thing, but many thanks for alerting me to Japan Exposures, which is an absolutely fascinating website.
Posted by: Puplet | Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 07:20 AM
While I do not see any idiosyncrasies in adapting and using non-Leica lenses with quite different imaging qualities on an M body, I doubt the vintage design Hologon with its _extremely_ angled light rays would produce high-quality images on the M8(.2) sensor.
Not that I own either piece (or ever will).
Posted by: Pete | Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 10:51 AM