Plug warning: I don't usually do this—point out bargains—because where would you stop? And I know most of our readers are interested in higher-level cameras than this. (Although readers have been buying lots of these
recently). But this seems like a notably good bargain. I recommended a D40x to my next-door neighbor—the predecessor to this camera—and she loves it. The current camera is the 10-MP D60, and in this B&H kit, on sale for $200 off right now, it comes with a decent VR (image stabilizing) normal zoom and a telephoto zoom (although the quality of the latter is unknown to me)—all for $589.
And before you scorn, consider that this camera exceeds the specification of a camera that 10 or 12 years ago would have been about the size of a phone book and cost six months to a year of the average American's salary.
Not a screaming bargain, possibly, but still talkin' loud enough to listen to.
___________________
Mike
Please bookmark our Amazin' links:
Amazon U.S. link
Amazon U.K. link
Amazon Germany link
Amazon Canada link
Featured Comment by Paul De Zan: "For me, the D40/D60 cameras are really the only DSLRs, because I just won't carry anything bigger or heavier. Despite the small sensor and low-end geegaws, a D40 will turn night into day in a way I've never been able to consistently achieve with 35mm film. It's also a far better action camera than the specs would suggest. If you're not a serious print maker, you really don't need anything else."
Featured Comment by Ed Richards: "If you are looking for a second camera for family outings and carrying around when you do not feel like a pack mule, do not miss the deals on the D40 with the 18–55 [currently $450 after rebate —MJ]. I bought one and carried it on outings on a recent vacation, rather than the D700. It was great, and a $39 8 gig card gives you 1000 RAW images. Nothing like not having to mess with downloading for a whole trip, or just buy two cards and be good for weeks. :-)"
Mike, I wonder if you put up phrases like "And I know most of our readers are interested in higher-level cameras than this" just to get comments ;-))
However I think this is an interesting question and should be "polled" perhaps.
Personally I think nobody could hinder you from taking high quality photos with a d60 and kit zoom. And I think almost nobody who thinks (s)he needs a higher level camera would see the difference.
Posted by: Andreas | Saturday, 20 December 2008 at 02:28 PM
"I wonder if you put up phrases like "And I know most of our readers are interested in higher-level cameras than this" just to get comments ;-))"
Andreas,
No, no--it's true. I did a poll, and found that our readers most commonly have cameras at the 50D/D90/K20D/E-30/A700 level.
4,630 readers participated. You can see the results here (either vote or click on "Show me the results"):
http://www.vizu.com/vot/Grab-bag/Hobbies/cameras/poll-vote.html?n=116260
Mike J.
Posted by: Mike J. | Saturday, 20 December 2008 at 02:28 PM
Back in the spring I saw a clearance sale in an electronics store on the Olympus E410 with a 14-42 zoom for 279 Euros (around US$400 at the time) I bought it right away, even though I'm a "Nikon user" most of the time. So why the Olympus? Because I wasn't thinking in terms of compatibility with my "real" camera and lenses, currently a D200.
Instead I was thinking in terms of: I don't want to carry a big heavy camera around all the time, but I've never personally got the hang of getting decent pictures with pocket digicams (I'm perfectly aware that other people can do it). I wanted a small, light camera with which I can get decent pictures. The Olympus is fitting the bill pretty nicely so far. I guess I would be the target market for the Micro 4/3 system, except that the new Panasonic ain't cheap (yet), whereas at the price the Oly 410 was going at, it would have been a crime not to buy it.
One minor pain in the ass is, yes, that the version of ACR that I have (CS2) can't read the Oly raw files, and Olympus' converter produces decent results but is slow, has an ugly user interface and is not what I'm used to using.
Posted by: Alan Little | Saturday, 20 December 2008 at 03:10 PM
Unless one really needs super-speedy autofocus or top-notch low-light capabilities, a camera like this is really the bee's knees. Light, compact, and a great deal.
Posted by: Eolake Stobblehouse | Saturday, 20 December 2008 at 04:46 PM
How about a D90 for around $830 from B&H, or $770 from J&R after Live.com cashback? Or a D300 plus 8GB CF card for $1200? I can only shake my head in amazement what a bad economy will do to desparate manufacturers. Back in September someone asked if the D90 will be selling under $850 by the end of the year. My answer was "when hell freezes over". It sure is cold up here in the Pacific Northwest, but not quite cold enough for hell to freeze over.
Posted by: Boyan | Saturday, 20 December 2008 at 06:52 PM
Mike,
I must say I've used these cameras myself. The D40 in Venice last year and the D60 more recently in Cornwall. They were a lot of fun, the pictures were great. I really enjoyed the experience. Don't know if the pictures would be better or worse that from some other camera but that hardly matters. They're all pretty good. And at these prices it's just plain amazing what you can get.
Posted by: Jim Richardson | Saturday, 20 December 2008 at 08:02 PM
Saw Adorama selling the K20D with 18-55 zoom for $699. 14 Mpix APS-C camera with weather resistance and in-camera anti-shake. Now, that's a deal....
Posted by: Mark Erickson | Saturday, 20 December 2008 at 10:50 PM
I currently am using D200, 120 format TLR's, and for "traveling light", A d60.
Very nice little machine. You can customize it in the menus, and pretty much turn off all the fluff features. In fact you can actually even decide what you want to have in the menus you see. So most of the "consumer" features can be surpressed.
IQ is good. With the D200, I do RAW. Usually with the D60, depending on my mood (B&W or punched up for cartoon color), but in JPEG.
A fun, light, unit. The Kit lense (18-55 VR) is surprisingly good, optics-wise.
Posted by: Jay Moynihan | Saturday, 20 December 2008 at 11:40 PM
You sometimes wonder how such a camera can be produced and distributed at such a price. My D60 is a marvelous little camera, lightweight, compact and very versatile with the 16-85 lens. And this at some 200€ more than a canon G10.
And it will also slip into your jacket pocket, if you buy an oversized Barbour Durham .... :-)
Posted by: JCdeR | Sunday, 21 December 2008 at 01:41 PM
Just a heads up
Look at Ritz Camera for a dealon a Nikon D40
Nikon D40 Digital SLR w/
18-55mm AF Zoom Lens
6.1MP, 2.5" LCD. Regularly $499.99 - Save $50 instantly! Plus, free $50 gift coupon & free printer offer
And they don't charge tax!
Posted by: Rick Barry | Sunday, 21 December 2008 at 05:13 PM