OK Mike, now you need to find a copy of the Zeiss ZF 35mm / f2. It is an incredible combination with the D700. The Nikkor cannot hold a candle to it, as I'm sure you know.
I use the 35mm on my D300 as a normal lens. It always works well, focuses quite closely, and gives good results. The tight-but-not-too-tight focus ring is great for when I need manual focusing. This lens is probably one of my best photography investments.
The 35mm f/2 AF is my favorite lense due to IQ, for my DX DSLR bodies.
Find it to be excellent.
Funny thing is, I hardly ever used it when purchased years ago. It did not shine at all on my film bodies.
I find the 35/2 to be quite mediocre at the wider apertures (less-than-nice bokeh, lowish contrast). From f/5.6 on it´s very good.
The Zeiss 35/2 ZF (I think you´re familiar with that lens) is IMHO far better and balances nicely on the D700, although it is about twice the size of the Nikkor.
Now I understand the heading, having just read the 24-120 post. And the photograph is beautiful. It has a wonderful feeling of calm, the sense of twilight is palpable (I'll have to look that word up but I think I using it correctly)
BTW, don't you have another picture of the same scene shot with the 7D, maybe. It would be interesting to see them together.
Mike, don't forget to try the 85mm f/1.8 - that's also a little gem which is affordable and a pleasure to use.
Posted by: Kelvin L | Friday, 28 November 2008 at 07:56 PM
The arrival looks positive!
Lovely photograph.
Posted by: Andrew Smith | Friday, 28 November 2008 at 08:14 PM
OK Mike, now you need to find a copy of the Zeiss ZF 35mm / f2. It is an incredible combination with the D700. The Nikkor cannot hold a candle to it, as I'm sure you know.
Posted by: dkreithen | Friday, 28 November 2008 at 08:28 PM
That combination (D700 + small 35mm lens) looks like a lot of fun.
Posted by: Ricardo | Friday, 28 November 2008 at 08:36 PM
"OK Mike, now you need to find a copy of the Zeiss ZF 35mm / f2. It is an incredible combination with the D700."
But why? If the lens you have does everything you need, why bother?
Stephen.
Posted by: Stephen Sienczyk | Saturday, 29 November 2008 at 02:26 AM
I use the 35mm on my D300 as a normal lens. It always works well, focuses quite closely, and gives good results. The tight-but-not-too-tight focus ring is great for when I need manual focusing. This lens is probably one of my best photography investments.
Posted by: Marcus Peddle | Saturday, 29 November 2008 at 02:47 AM
I hear talk of a new Nikkor 38/1.8 and 135/1.8 this coming week.....
Posted by: Guy Collier | Saturday, 29 November 2008 at 04:10 AM
"I hear talk of a new Nikkor 38/1.8 and 135/1.8 this coming week....."
You're just playin' with me!
Mike J.
Posted by: Mike J. | Saturday, 29 November 2008 at 04:14 AM
The 35mm f/2 AF is my favorite lense due to IQ, for my DX DSLR bodies.
Find it to be excellent.
Funny thing is, I hardly ever used it when purchased years ago. It did not shine at all on my film bodies.
Posted by: Jay Moynihan | Saturday, 29 November 2008 at 09:13 AM
35/2 AIS ? or AF-D ?
Posted by: william | Saturday, 29 November 2008 at 11:34 AM
"35/2 AIS ? or AF-D ?"
William,
AF. Pre-D.
Mike J.
Posted by: Mike J. | Saturday, 29 November 2008 at 01:46 PM
Mike,
I find the 35/2 to be quite mediocre at the wider apertures (less-than-nice bokeh, lowish contrast). From f/5.6 on it´s very good.
The Zeiss 35/2 ZF (I think you´re familiar with that lens) is IMHO far better and balances nicely on the D700, although it is about twice the size of the Nikkor.
Carsten
Posted by: Carsten Bockermann | Saturday, 29 November 2008 at 02:46 PM
Now I understand the heading, having just read the 24-120 post. And the photograph is beautiful. It has a wonderful feeling of calm, the sense of twilight is palpable (I'll have to look that word up but I think I using it correctly)
BTW, don't you have another picture of the same scene shot with the 7D, maybe. It would be interesting to see them together.
Posted by: Dennis Allshouse | Saturday, 29 November 2008 at 06:29 PM