« Panasonic LX3 Barrel Distortion Controversy |
| Hubble Space Telescope Advent Calendar »
A nice mixed-media piece (stills, video, music) created using the D90 by Mike Kobal.
Mike (Thanks to Thomas K. Whiting)
Send this post to a friend
Posted at 04:10 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00df351e888f88340105364a0002970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nikon D90 on the L Train:
Pretty much the way I envision the optimal usage of the D90 video. Also, just some real nice work.
Saturday, 06 December 2008 at 05:52 PM
I imagine we'll be seeing a lot more of this type of thing with the advent of DSLR video... An interesting idea for sure.
Kind of interesting that Mike chose to shoot mainly in few underground areas of a train which gets its name for being mostly elevated. It would be a completely different light if he were above ground.
Michael Metts |
Saturday, 06 December 2008 at 06:08 PM
"Kind of interesting that Mike chose to shoot mainly in few underground areas of a train which gets its name for being mostly elevated. It would be a completely different light if he were above ground."
Not the "El." The "L."
Adam Isler |
Saturday, 06 December 2008 at 07:43 PM
Look and feel is cool but I sorta wish it had a straighter narrative.
Editing was quite good and thought the music did its thing too.
charlie d |
Saturday, 06 December 2008 at 08:38 PM
Hate to be a nay-sayer but...
The content is great. Good use of the video to create a distinct style working with the limitations. Nice stills. Together capturing different aspects of the nature of underground travel.
And there is the problem - the differences. to my eyes, this is 2 complementary projects which just don't gel well in this mixed presentation. Plus I like to dictate the pace at which I view photographs.
As for the music - it was so much of a distraction I had to turn the sound off half way through.
So far, any mixed media work I've seen like this seem to be an excuse to do it because it can be done, and ultimately presentation ends up detracting from the content.
Martin Doonan |
Sunday, 07 December 2008 at 04:40 AM
I saw this earlier on DPReview forums in a "Why do I need Video in a SLR" flame war. I have to say, this helped me make up my mind. In the right hands (like Mike's) its a very compelling and powerful artistic tool.
Sunday, 07 December 2008 at 11:45 AM
The stills are great (though some are slightly overworked for my taste), and very powerful overall. It's really hard to take fresh images from something as overdone as "subway documentary," but he did a great job at bringing out the humanity, felt like a real documentary instead of grab shots.
But isn't putting a soft filter on a 17-35 some kind of crime? ;-)
Ryan Brenizer |
Sunday, 07 December 2008 at 08:15 PM
Like Ryan, I like the still shot but hate the soft filter video. After a few minute, have to stop the watch it. I am still why it so turn off me, especially I like the still picture very much.
Dennis Ng |
Monday, 08 December 2008 at 06:46 AM
I agree the stills were good but the video distracting. It looked like the stuttery 15 fps movie clips we used to see on old compact digicams. This would have been a better presentation without the video.
I think the 5D MKII will be a better tool for this job.
Monday, 08 December 2008 at 10:13 AM
5D2 video isn't stabilized and it will be a shaky mess just as this is. Actually, the D90 captures video at the industry standard framerate, whereas the Canon does not. Without some fairly massive improvement both implementations of video will not reach up to pro-video capture level.
Tuesday, 09 December 2008 at 11:25 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.
A Buck or Two