« August 2008 | Main | October 2008 »

September 2008

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

IJFR

Our friend Michael Tapes (he of the WhiBal), along with his colleagues at Imagenomic, have created a neat new free utility called Instant JPEG from RAW (IJFR). IJFR is not an application; it's a utility that attaches itself to the Win or Mac OS. It also doesn't process or develop RAW files; it merely extracts the JPEG that's already in all your RAWs. Its functionality isn't unique, but for many people it will be handy. Take a look at how it works:

What does it mean for you? No more shooting "RAW + JPEG" with most cameras, for one thing—no need. No more waiting for your converter to create JPEGs from large directories of RAWs—it's actually instant unless you're also resizing for the web, in which case it's just very fast. And no more waiting for frame-by-frame rendering when you zoom in. And, really, no more reason to shoot JPEG at all—the JPEG is there in the RAW file anyway, so when you shoot RAW you already have both.

More info:

Scott Kelby's post about it

Michael's post about IJFR on his newly redesigned RawWorkflow.com site

Michael's guest post on Scott's blog (includes a brief history of RAW converters)

IJFR download page

______________________

Mike  (Thanks to David E. and Michael T.)

Send this post to a friend

Featured Comment by Eamon Hickey: "The noodge in me can't resist a historical nitpick re: Michael T.'s history of RAW converters, and, since there are 103 comments under his post on Scott Kelby's site, I'll be a noodge here: Although for many, many regular folks, the history of DSLRs and associated software seems to begin with the Canon D30 in 2000, there were, in fact, many news photographers working with Kodak DSLRs going back to the early 1990s. They shot RAW (the only option on early Kodaks), and the pioneering RAW browsing/management application (not primarily a converter) was Photo Mechanic, which really did invent a lot of the paradigms we take for granted now in photo browsing applications. Its author, Dennis Walker, was even given a prestigious award by the National Press Photographers Association for his pioneering work. I wrote a couple of paragraphs about him in an article on the early history of DSLRs, if anyone's interested (Walker is on pg. 3)."

Michael Tapes responds: "Eamon, thanks for setting history straight. I did not mean to slight anyone, and clearly I did not join the raw club until the D30 era, and the club was formed long before that. Thanks for your post and giving credit where credit is due. Appreciated."
 

Monday, 29 September 2008

A Handsome Salyut

Dawsonsalyut

Three weekdays and six pictures have gone by since I last linked to Photob.org and the "Forgotten Pictures" challenge entries. Most recently, Andrew Dawson tells of his travails with this handsome but balky Salyut. (He sure took a pretty picture with it, too.)

___________________

Mike

Geoff Wittig's List (Great Photo Books You Can Buy New Part V)

Introduction: This article concludes our series "Great Photo Books You Can Buy New," begun when a reader requested a list of "the 10 or 25 most important and influential photography books in the last fifty or more years." I've taken a chance and held off on this last part for quite some time, risking the chance that Geoff's choices would go out of print; I was concerned that our posts were inducing buyer's fatigue in people who were trying to keep up with our suggestions. The links are to Amazon U.S., with apologies to our readers in the rest of the world—a general link to Amazon U.K. is here (others can be found here), but you will have to look up the individual titles you're interested in once you get there. Buying through our links does benefit the site, and doesn't cost you any extra. For easy reference, the complete list of posts in this series is linked at the bottom of this one. Now, for the list of suggestions from T.O.P.'s de facto reviewer-in-chief. As always, my thanks to Geoff.  —MJ

-

By Geoff Wittig

Mike Johnston's original post on the subject of putting together a working library or collection of photography books was a model of clear thinking, and an excellent guide to anyone starting out. For starters, let your own taste be your guide. This is your collection; you don't have to answer to anyone else. I would absolutely emphasize Mike's advice to "strike while the iron is hot"; while researching this I was astonished to learn just how many books I purchased a few years ago that are now going for $300 or more used, and unavailable new.

I will admit my biases from the start: my tastes lean strongly toward classical landscape photography, and I am pretty ignorant of work from Europe and Asia, so this colors my judgment. I generally organize my thinking around individual photographers rather than movements or "schools," but there's lots of overlap. Finally, I place great emphasis on a book as a work of art in its own right. Photo reproduction quality is always paramount, but such tangibles as paper quality, typography and design can add up to far more than the sum of their parts.

Stieglitzphaidon55 1. Alfred Stieglitz. The titan of modernist American photographic thought, I think he earns a place in any collection. The monumental two-volume Alfred Stieglitz: The Key Set lists for $150, but is heavily discounted and still available new. The "key set" of the title was the huge collection of Stieglitz's prints in the possession of Georgia O'Keefe, donated to the National Gallery in Washington, D.C. It includes examples of different print interpretations from the same negative, extensive scholarly notes by Sarah Greenough—the pre-eminent Stieglitz critic and scholar—and extensive footnotes. Reproduction quality is very good.
Alfred Stieglitz: Photographs and Writings is worth seeking out if you can find it used; a gorgeously printed monograph with letterpress printed text, it's probably the best concise summary of Stieglitz's photographic work. There are numerous soft-cover and hard-cover volumes on Stieglitz with repro quality varying all over the map; the Phaidon 55 version (pictured) is not half bad.

Picture_4 2. Edward Weston. Another giant in the field. My favorite would be the Lodima Press's gorgeously reproduced Life Work. This employs state-of-the-art quadtone and tri-tone plus 2 color inks, on two different paper stocks, to closely match Weston's actual prints. Okay, so it goes for $195, but it's still available new. It's vastly superior to the other recent retrospective, Edward Weston: A Photographer's Love of Life, which suffers from both middling image reproduction and truly dreadful typography & design. Edward Weston: The Last Years in Carmel is worth seeking out for a different take on Weston's final productive period, but it's already getting hard to find. Photography books even on a titan like Weston fall out of print quickly, so it's worth grabbing one new when it strikes your fancy. Dune, Kurt Markus's exquisite 2003 monograph on Edward & Brett Weston's photographs (of, yes, sand dunes,) sold new for $50 list. I bought it for the excellent photo reproductions and its superb period typography; now it goes for $150 used, if you can find it. Taschen and Merrell both published large-format monographs rather recently; no longer in print, they are worth checking used bookstores for; both are quite good.

Picture_5 3. Ansel Adams. Well, of course. There are a wealth of choices, since Adams never goes out of style. If you only want one, then Ansel Adams: 400 Photographs is clearly the one to have. Reproduction quality is very good, and it has a wide selection of Adams' work shown in chronological order by decade. But Adams' images need a bit more room to spread out to be really appreciated. Ansel Adams at 100 is the best recent monograph, with John Szarkowski's incisive (if a bit contrarian) commentary and gorgeous reproduction. Definitely spring for the much larger slip-cased hardcover edition over the cramped paperback if you can; it's still available from the Ansel Adams gallery. I also love Examples: The Making of 40 Photographs for the insight it provides into Adams' technical and artistic thinking. You can't really go wrong with any of the Little, Brown editions of Adams' work, because the reproduction standard is so uniformly high. Finally, the instructional trio of The Camera, The Negative and The Print are well worth owning if you want to "go deep" into the process of large format black-and-white film photography. The Print remains especially relevant in the age of Photoshop for explaining why you'd want to alter tonal relationships, rather than merely showing how.

4. Walker Evans. Hugely influential, though I find his style a bit chilly and condescending. The MoMA exhibition retrospective is still widely available, with quite good design & typography, and decent reproductions. I tend to lump Evans, fairly or unfairly, with the FSA photographers whose work I like better. Dorothea Lange, Horace Bristol, Arthur Rothstein, Ben Shahn...all of them have had decent monographs published, but they seem to go out of print almost as soon as they appear. Grab 'em when you can. Beverly Brannan's FSA: The American Vision is a good "photo anthology," as is Long Time Coming: A Photographic Portrait of America, 1935-1943 by Michael Lesy.

Picture_6
A spread from Long Time Coming by Michael Lesy

Picture_7 5. Eugene Richards. I wanted to cite W. Eugene Smith's work, but despite his immense influence, very little is in print currently. The best single volume is probably W. Eugene Smith Photographs 1934-1975 by Gilles Mora, but it's out of print, quite expensive, and hard to find. As a consolation, you can still buy Eugene Richards' The Fat Baby, a summary of this brilliant and daring photographer's work. I see Richards as the natural descendent of W. Eugene Smith, with the same burning social intensity and pictorial genius. I've spent a lot of my adult life in emergency rooms, and Richards' The Knife and Gun Club "gets it" like nothing I've ever seen on the subject. Cocaine True, Cocaine Blue and the recently reissued Dorchester Days are equally incisive.

Picture_8
David Plowden, East of Las Vegas, New Mexico, 1971

6. David Plowden. His elegiac black-and-white images of America's heartland railroads, bridges, small towns and farms quietly document a world that is passing out of sight. Simple, elegant, beautiful compositions and immaculate printing mark his prodigious output. Vanishing Point is his monumental and final retrospective, as he recently stopped photographing. Beautiful reproductions, excellent design and typography; simply a wonderful book. It's also available in a signed and numbered limited edition.

Picture_10 7. Elliot Porter. His pioneering work laid the foundation for all subsequent color landscape/nature photography, and the Sierra Club exhibition-format books of his work in the 1960s were the pioneering "coffee table" tomes. The Color of Wildness is still available from Aperture. Some reviews have criticized its color reproduction, and blocked-up shadows are an issue, but most of the plates look pretty good. Porter's gem-like, modestly sized dye transfer prints are difficult to convey on the printed page. Regarding the Land: Robert Glenn Ketchum and the Legacy of Elliot Porter contains better reproductions, and places Porter's work in a broader context. So many of the original Sierra Club books were sold that they can readily be found at used bookstores. They are really very nice; the typography is superb, with immaculate page design and appropriate use of refinements like f-ligatures and small caps. On the other hand, some of them demonstrate the limitations of 1960s color offset printing. Elliot Porter's work really cries out for a comprehensive retrospective using state-of-the-art color reproduction.

Picture_11 8. George Tice. From a pioneering revival of platinum printing to his work printing Edward Steichen's archive to his own decades-long documentation of urban landscapes, George Tice has created an immense and influential body of work. His capacity to draw pictorial beauty from prosaic subject matter is astonishing. The retrospective George Tice: Urban Landscapes is still available new, and it's excellent; cleanly designed, with elegant typography and good reproductions. There are several other books currently available, including Paterson II.

Mccurrymountains_2

9. Steve McCurry. His haunting photograph of an Afghan refugee girl is probably the most iconic portrait since Alex Korda's Che Guevara. His work is marked by rich color and subtle composition, together with a moving sense of the dignity of his subjects. I don't think anyone has ever put Kodachrome's distinctive color palette to better use. There are quite a few of his books currently in print. I still like South Southeast, the color reproduction in which is superb; but In the Shadow of Mountains, Looking East, or The Path to Buddha are also lovely.

Burtynskyquarries_2 10. Edward Burtynsky. It took me quite a while to "get" Burtynsky's work, but it finally clicked when I watched the video Manufactured Landscapes. The photographer describes an epiphany he experienced in Pennsylvania while looking for conventionally pretty landscape subjects; he looked around and realized everything in sight had been completely reshaped by coal mining. There was no "landscape" but what industry had created. Burtynsky's immaculately composed large format color images draw surprising pictorial beauty from immense Chinese factories, ship-breaking yards, marble quarries, colossal piles of coal and other industrial realities. Quarries is beautifully printed and a fine introduction to his work. China is also very nice. I have not personally seen the book Manufactured Landscapes, but several reviews comment negatively on the reproductions.

Picture_20 11. Galen Rowell. A number of reviewers including the New York Times and some guy named Johnston disparaged Rowell's work for his frequent use of graduated neutral density filters, implying that he used gimmicks to juice up the color of his photos. But through numerous books and magazine articles Rowell articulated a consistent philosophy. He started out as a mountaineer; his goal was simply to record the beautiful mountain light his eyes could see. Anyone who's witnessed gorgeous post-sunset alpenglow but ended up with burned-out sky and blocked up foreground shadows on film can understand the problem. To this end he studied perceptual theory, the physics of light, and the technical limitations of camera and film. The result was a large body of genuinely spectacular photographs of the natural world. Yes, Yosemite doesn't have a brilliant shaft of sunlight striking a granite face at last light every day. But when it happens, it's the kind of moment you remember for a lifetime. Rowell learned how to catch that moment on film, time after time. Galen Rowell: A Retrospective is a fine summary of his work, with many excellent color reproductions. But also consider Mountain Light, first published in 1985. It's been  selling ever since, with good reason. The superb typesetting was by MacKenzie-Harris in SanFrancisco, one of the last hot-metal printers. The extensive text delves into Rowell's working methods with a dash of philosophy and history thrown in. Great stuff.

Picture_19 12. Sebastiao Salgado. Simply brilliant black-and-white documentary work from around the developing world; there's nothing quite like it. A number of his books are still available; just pick your favorite and you can't go wrong. An Uncertain Grace from 2000 is a good sampling of his work, though Workers and Sahel are more focused. Don't hesitate if you like his work, though; Amazon lists used copies of Migrations for anything from $241 to over $700.

As a final note, there are lots of very important names left off my modest list, only because their work is not readily available in book form these days. This includes luminaries such as Margaret Bourke-White (there's a good recent retrospective, yet it's already out of print ), August Sander (Taschen's retrospective has very good reproductions, but likewise no longer available new) and Minor White.

_____________________

Geoff

Send this post to a friend

(Note: The above link is a recent new feature, designed to make it easy to shoot a link to your friends you think might be interested. In this case I urge you to use it; although it might not look like it, an awful lot of work went into our big series on photo books, and yet the clock is ticking on its usefulness...every day, more and more of the titles we've researched for you go bye-bye. Any list of book recommendations these days is built on shifting sands.

Would you do us a favor and please post a link on other mailing lists, forums, and sites you frequent? Many thanks.  —MJ)

Our Entire Series of Photo Book Posts:

The 10 to 25 Books

Great Photo Books You Can Buy New—Part I: Reissues by Mike Johnston

Mike's Great Empirical Milwaukee Bookstore Walkabout by Mike Johnston

We All Love Photography Now, It's Official! by Martin Parr (Great Photo Books You Can Buy New, Part II)

Great Photo Books You Can Buy New—Part III: New Books by Mike Johnston

Jeff Ladd's List (Great Photo Books You Can Buy New, Part IV) by Jeff Ladd

-

Featured Comment by Greg Smith: "Galen Rowell's book Mountain Light is remarkable in two ways: 1) his images are top-of-the-line first rate, regardless who might complain about his techniques and, more importantly I think, 2) the accompanying text detailing what he did, and why, goes beyond excellent and becomes a post-graduate text curriculum of outdoor photography. My copy of this book is dog-eared, highlighted, studied hard and long because it clearly and precisely tells how-to...it is no mystery why it keeps on selling: the images and text are timeless and valuable beyond mere dollars. If you only get one photo book, there are good reasons for this to be the one."

Sunday, 28 September 2008

Separated at Birth?

You full-feed readers will be happy to learn that Eolake Stobblehouse, a friend of this site from the beginning and a frequent contributor to the comments section, has agreed to subsidize full feeds, in a deal which includes a new ad. Eolake is something of a legend on the web—his site, DOMAI (WARNING! Adult content at the link) is one of the web's great success stories. A nude picture site, it's not p*rn unless you happen to be a Puritan or a fundamentalist Moslem (and I've always disliked the term "soft p*rn," which reads to me like "gentle viciousness" or "mild violence" or some such near-oxymoron). It features respectful if rather exuberant female nudes—think '50s and '60s Playboy and you'll have about the right gestalt. The new ad labeled "Joyful Nudes" is his. He also kindly agreed to feature just a face in the ad, to accommodate people in workplaces or schools who might be discomfited by anything even slightly more explicit. (Surely no one will object to a face and word "nudes"? If so, it's full feeds for you!) Anyway, it's thanks to him that full feeds will continue for a good long while. Just so you know who's buttering your bread. If you don't want to visit DOMAI, you might want to stop by Eolake's blog, which is non-commercial, family friendly, multi-interest, and has many photography-related posts.

Also, oddly enough, our recent posts about Vincent Laforet led to a rather interesting discovery—Vincent and Eolake are near dead-ringers.

Eolake
Eolake Stobblehouse

Picture_12
Vincent Laforet (left)

___________________________

Mike

Send this post to a friend

Deals! Deals!

Prices of camera media continue to plummet. How about a paltry $104.95 after rebate for an 8 GB Sandisk Extreme IV CF card? Or how about $17.95 after rebate for a Sandisk 4 GB Extreme III?

And if you shoot Nikon, get over to Strobist right now to check out a deal they've discovered.

____________________

Mike

Send this post to a friend

Saturday, 27 September 2008

Paul Newman

Newman
Paul Newman by Andy Gotts

I think I'll watch Cat on a Hot Tin Roof tonight, or maybe Cool Hand Luke. Or The Color of Money or Nobody's Fool or The Hustler or Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.

My son, who's 15, says he's never heard of Paul Newman.

__________________

Mike

Featured Comment by Greg Smith: "What a talent Newman was...aside from his always great movies, what cemented him in my mind as someone above the herd were his multiple national championships driving fast sports cars. SCCA racing at that level is a howling pack of snapping, biting, thrusting dogs all chasing the rabbit where the tiniest mistake and you are at the back of the pack if you're still running at all. Newman ran at the front and usually won. In racing circles it's acknowledged that he was good enough to have been pro and make his living at it...if he hadn't had Hollywood. A very cool customer...in a lot of different respects."

Featured Comment by Jack M.: "I knew Paul for the last 30 years. I never met a kinder man. Nice of you to run this piece, and he would have appreciated that the photo you ran was B&W, as he got very tired of people trying to take photos of his blue eyes."

Random Excellence: Lee Pickett

Picture_10
Automobile accident at Index, January 13, 1928

Picture_11
A. Guthrie and Co. equipment, August 5, 1927

I can usually stand but so much reading and writing about gear. After too much of it, the time comes when I have to go take refuge in pictures again. Nothing's quite as bracing as a good historical archive, looking at the work of photographers who often had only one shot to work with and generally had no artistic pretensions because photography—their photography, certainly—wasn't considered art. They often simply photographed things they found interesting, meaningful, unusual, or remarkable.

The University of Washington Libraries Digital Initiatives program has a large selection online from its archives of the work of Lee Pickett, a photographer who worked in Washington State from 1911 until the 1940s. The official photographer of the Great Northern Railway, he was based in Index, Washington, in the heart of the Cascade Mountains.

The writing of titles and notes directly on the negatives is often a tip-off to a working photographer's lack of artistic pretense; it's almost a formal flag of the primacy of the documentary record. (Although photographers got good at writing backwards, they sometimes still slanted their letters forward as they wrote, making the slant look backwards in the print.)

Note the crude but effective posing aids in the picture below (that's one way to make dogs sit still for a picture!). Two of the dogs are looking intently at the man whose foot appears in the right side of the frame. A beautiful photograph, of which any postmodernist could be proud.

Picture_8
Bobcat killed near Index, no date.

________________________________

Mike

Send this post to a friend

Featured Comment by John Roberts: "'They often simply photographed things they found interesting, meaningful, unusual, or remarkable.' I find this approach to photography many times produces work that is so much more interesting than what is usually offered up as 'art' photography. Perhaps it's the complete lack of pretense that allows photographers like Mr. Pickett to produce photographs that still hold our interest so many decades later."

Featured Comment by John Robison: "When I view photos like these, of a long gone time, I have a question. Who are taking pictures today of the usual, the boring, the record, the mundane, the ebb and flow of "common" things. Photos that will wind up in the main street museums of towns small and large? Seeing these makes me want to grab the largest format camera I have, load it with some 100 iso film, and go make pictures of these very common things."

Mike replies: I've always said that at the very least, cities and states should have official "public photographers" whose job it is to document everyday life, what the city looks like at any given time, simply to leave some tracks and make a record. If it were something that we had started doing a hundred years ago, no one would question it. But since we don't do it, no one sees the point in it. It would amount to the most minuscule drop in the bucket of public expenses, but it would likely provide a meaningful adjunct to the motley of pictures that are taken (and that endure) haphazardly, by artists, amateurs, snapshooters, photojournalists, and for commercial purposes. To answer your question, though, probably the closest thing to what you're talking about are newspaper photographers. Of course, one problem with that is that when newspapers go out of business, often as not their archives are discarded.

Featured Comment by John Camp: "Actually, the place where this gets done, a lot, is not museums but state historical societies. They often buy large collections of genre photos, absorb old newspaper files, and so on. These society files, along with newspaper files, regularly get used to create "Our Town Yesterday" books, which you can find everywhere. I even wrote the introduction to one, called Strange Days, Dangerous Nights, by Larry Millet.

Picture_2
Strange Days, Dangerous Nights

"For people who live near a state capital, the historical societies are photographic treasure-houses, as are (sometimes, depending on the funding mechanism) local county and city historical societies. A pretty famous photo book, Wisconsin Death Trip, came mostly through one of these societies, I think (from Jackson County, Wisconsin).

"While these societies are a wonderful resource for daily photography, one problem is that the photos tend to be 'event' oriented. I think there might be some value to organizing a kind of photo expedition which would simply take 'flat' photos—the interiors of supermarkets and stores and factories, document dress and 'what's in the refrigerator' and medicine cabinets, including close-ups of the contents of medicines and cereals and all the other things we put in our mouths...a kind of uninflected index of our civilization at this point." 

Mike adds: Wisconsin Death Trip is a great book, although it's one I've never owned (I thoroughly osmosed the library's copy in art school).

Canon 5D Mark II Video Quality

Picture_14
Michael Reichmann with the new Canon 5D Mark II

There are two new videos on the web showing off the video capability of the new Canon 5D Mark II. One is by Michael Reichmann of The Luminous Landscape, a longtime Canon fan and an advocate of the coming confusion between still and moving images. Well, "confusion"—that's editorializing on my part. Michael R. calls it "confluence" or "synergence" or some such word, and says that the DSLRs with video are "confab-cams" or "jumbo-cams" or...well, crap, I can't remember anything these days. Watch the video. You'll see. (It's near the bottom of the linked page, although the whole page is interesting.)

The second 5DII video is by New York Times ace photographer Vincent Laforet, a name you should recognize—he's one of the top editorial assignment photographers working today. The guy's a monster in that field. I have to warn you (and I hate to say it—along with Joe McNally, Vincent Laforet really is one of the assignment photographers whose work I admire most, and I've featured him in "Random Excellence" in the past—) but the video itself is dreadful. It's overproduced, heavily stylized in the familiar empty, unfilling fashion of television commercials, full of tired fashion magazine mannerisms, and short on even the most glancing implication of substance (mannekin people, vague tropes of romance, yatta^2).

I don't know if I'm even allowed to say that. I know it's just supposed to be a "test" of the equipment, and the honorable tradition of "test shots" is that they're allowed to be lousy or good or whatever and you're not supposed to say. Still, video traps you, which is one of the things I don't like about it; I had to watch the thing, and you will too if you follow the link to see the 5DII's video quality, so I just thought I'd warn you. (I hope V.L. doesn't read this; I don't need another famous person hating me.)

Picture_16
Mannerism 101: Is "Looks just like a TV commercial!" the new "Looks just like a postcard"?

It does bring up an interesting point, though—will having video capability in good still cameras mean that great still photographers are going to get sucked into becoming bad videographers? (Remember '80s typography, when every cool cat with a computer got Pagemaker and suddenly every hip magazine went all to hell?) Just a thought. Here's hoping Mr. Laforet sticks to his strength: stills.

Oh, and something funny about Michael Reichmann's video: I have my computer hooked up to a hi-fi amp and speakers through an outboard DAC, and in the middle of Michael's presentation a dog starts barking nearby. When that happened, my dog, Lulu, went racing all over the house, barking frantically, looking for the intruder she could hear but couldn't locate. It sure made the video more exciting, but I'm glad that Canadian canine quieted down before Michael's video ended because Lulu might have hurt herself. (I love that dog.)

__________________________

Mike

Send this post to a friend

Featured Comment by Stephen Gillette: "I cite Michael Reichmann's recent paraphrase of the talking dog joke: maybe the dog doesn't have much to say...but...he's a talking dog! Vincent Laforet's video struck me, too, as a slick assembly of clichés. But guys, this dog was talking! Laforet was very skillful in using a huge arsenal of Canon lenses, seamlessly and to great effect. The flowing images are, for me, absolutely delicious. Empty calories? Yep! But who cares, really? Cinema quality, shot with a DSLR. Yikes."

Featured Comment by François Colou: "Hi, I'm a video guy and I find the video quality excellent. The color gamut looks wider than most camcorders. However the image is very contrasty with crunched blacks. Nothing bad, it's probably an aesthetic choice, but having the 'video signature' in the highlights and being shot at 30 frames per seconds, it doesn't look like film.

"The optical quality is very good too and very new. We've already done some Scheimpflung effects on videos, but it was done in post and the result was not as natural as those.

"They have used a gyro stabiliser, that's how they got those fluid motions, a very expensive solution. It will be interesting to see how next generation Pentax and Sony cameras manage to do video with sensor stabilisation. it would be a must for those wide angle shots in a car.

"I agree with you Mike, the directing of the spot is very bad. The camera positions don't have any signification. Worst, there is not a single cut that means anything. I'm sorry for the editor, who probably had to do with uneditable footages. No comment on the actors' performances.

"A modest word of advice for photographers tempted by video: if you don't master editing, and if you don't know how to choose a point of view that makes sense in a story, don't pretend being a director. Just do it for fun!"

Featured Comment by Bernard: "The video quality looks very usable, but you still need a seperate sound crew, lights, grips, fluid heads, and a thousand other things to make a movie. Even then, you won't have lenses that you can attach a follow-focus mechanism to, so shooting will be much more difficult than with a 'real' video camera. Is there any way to feed timecode information to the camera, or are you going to need to slate and manually synch all of your shots? Still, I wouldn't be surprised if someone used an SLR to make a great indie film. Anyone who's ever shot with a Bolex knows that equipment limitations are part of the fun, and can help drive the creative process."

Featured Comment by Vincent Laforet: "Mike—not to worry—I definitely don't 'hate you' as a result of your post. And I really don't see myself as 'famous' either—but thanks for that compliment and the others at the very least.

"Listen—the film is what it is: something that I could realistically produce with less than 12 hours notice. In fact the most apt way of describing the video I've heard is a 'cologne commercial.' The sole purpose of this little short film was to demonstrate the image quality of this camera in a way that did not make people fall asleep. Let's be honest—did you prefer the video release by Canon of the squirrel?   

"I respect what you have to say—and am not at all blind to the difference between this short film—and the relative depth of the work I have done in the past during such events as 9/11 and Katrina. But you've got to realize that while I respect you wanting me to stay boxed into 'what I do best'—if you and your readers don't at the very least—try—your hand at video—these economic times and the trends in the business will make it increasingly difficult for anyone that 'just' shoots stills.

"Okay—the only thing I will criticize you for is your statement of 'I hope V.L. doesn't read this....' While blogs are incredible tools (and I love them) I assume that everything I write about it, on any topic, or on anyone—will be read by that person...the web is just too public a place and too easily searchable...."

Mike replies: Actually, I'm more than happy to have you see it, Vincent, and thanks for your reply and for being a good sport. I will look forward to being among the audience of your future work in video (although you'll have to forgive me if I continue to prefer non-moving pictures).

The more I think about this, though, the more examples I come up with of great photographers at least taking a detour into moving pictures—sometimes extended ones. Cartier-Bresson was an assistant to Jean Renoir early on, wasn't he? And Sheeler made films, and Robert Frank, and William Klein, Ralph Steiner, Strand—the list could get pretty long. And while none of the ones I can think of were ever great filmmakers, surely that's because I'm thinking from the perspective of still photography—someone who know films well could probably come up with examples of great directors who made an early start as still photographers, but just aren't remembered for that now. (Wasn't Arthur Penn a still photographer?)

At the very least, though, I wonder what effect it will have on concentration. I can't even shoot B&W and color at the same time—surely switching back and forth between video and stills while covering an event isn't going to be either conceptually or logistically easy...?

Friday, 26 September 2008

Random Excellence: Hin Chua

Picture_5

I can't remember when or where I first encountered the work of Hin Chua, a young Australian from Perth, born in Malaysia, now working in London. But his pictures made an impression on me; some of them I remember still, specifically, even though I haven't seen them in several years. (With me that's saying something, because I look at a lot of pictures.) He says he "picked up a camera in an attempt to get over a girl."

I don't know how I ran across him this time, either, but somehow (a Google image search, maybe?), I discovered he has some pictures on flickr. I don't normally care for flickr but I looked at perhaps 600 of the 1350 pictures he has posted there. (I don't know how to link to flickr. Search "Hin Chua" and you should find him more easily than I could.) Naturally with that many pictures not all of them are masterpieces, but he sure has got an eye.

Picture_3

He's gotten more serious about his photography since I encountered him last: better cameras, bigger negs, website. And that's good; he's respecting his talent. I think he has a book out, too (and I'd like to know for sure). He still seems a little immature to me—as an artist, I mean—but maybe that's because the way he sees is young: brilliant, profligate, callow. I certainly don't know if I've picked the best examples to show here. A thousand of us could look at his pictures and come away with a thousand different favorites. You could quarrel with my picks. Propose alternates. (These two are from "After the Fall" and "Mare Nostrum.") I like this photographer better than most, that much I will say.

________________________

Mike

Featured Comment by Curio: "On Shane L.'s site, Chua wrote, 'Flickr functions as an online version of Diane Arbus’ wall. You know the one. the wall covered with work prints, the ones you’re trying to see if you can still bear to look at in a few months time. Except in this case, any man and his dog can wander in. It also just so happens that a few great people whose views I respect also pass through from time to time, and their thoughts, comments and suggestions have really helped shape the work. I have a living room full of work prints, and while it’s a damn nicer sight to look at, it hasn’t been as creatively beneficial as the Flickr version. Flickr (like the world) is what you make of it, and there’s just no way you can tar it with any one brush.' "

Thursday, 25 September 2008

Just Posted: 'Reserving Judgment'

My latest column was posted a few days ago on Photo.net. It's called "Reserving Judgment." It centers around the Sony A900, but it's really about the increasingly typical reactions of the internet hoi polloi (anyone reading this being company not included) to new cameras—reactions which occasionally exhibit features of mass hysteria.

The A900 and the Canon 5D Mark II together effectively constitute a new class of DSLR—35mm-frame, ultra-high-pixel-count pro-am cameras. Together they take a shark bite out of the low end of the digital medium-format back market, and are a considerable enticement to photographers who print large and whose overriding priority is image quality. I think the more anticipated Canon 5DII will be of greater interest to the majority of photographers, due to three interrelated factors: Canon's higher market share, its much greater installed base, and the loyalty and ongoing admiration of EOS 5D owners for that camera. (Despite its age, I don't expect prices of used 5D's to drop all that much; I doubt it will go much lower than $1,500 any time soon.)

Canon5dmkii_front

And me? Despite the common wisdom, I find myself swimming against the mainstream again (gee, there's a new position for me). The similarities between the A900 and the 5DII, broadly speaking, are perhaps greater than their differences, but the major difference is huge: it's that the 5DII offers video capability and the A900 doesn't, and the A900 offers built-in image stabilization and the 5DII doesn't. That will make the choice between the two very easy for lots of people. Many, I suppose, will come down in favor of video, although just how appealing that feature will really be in serious still cameras is something I don't think has conclusively been demonstrated yet, despite the conventional consensus that it's the coming thing. The choice is certainly easy for me: built-in IS is a feature I like very much, and I have little need for and almost no interest in video. Sony it is. (Or would be, if I were buying.)

When I was a magazine editor, I used to like two kinds of article submissions best: the really good ones, and the really bad ones. You can imagine why. It was because either kind made the decision I had to make very easy. It was the ones in the middle I found difficult: articles that were good but not great. Those were the ones that gave me fits. I would end up accepting some and rejecting others, but deciding which and why sometimes cost a good deal of psychic energy.

For those in the market for what they offer and able to afford the pricetags, the two new pro-am cams are at least likely to be easy to decide between. Either you're a satisfied 5D owner looking to upgrade or already invested in Canon lenses, or you need or like the video capability, and you'll go straight to the Canon; or you'll have no particular pre-existing attachment to Canon, and don't need or want video, or perhaps you do want IS with all the lenses you'll ever buy, in which case you'll gravitate towards Sony's camera.

Either way, this is a decision between closely competing camera models that most people are likely to find easier than most. For once.

______________________

Mike

Send this post to a friend

Featured Comment by Clayton: "You knew this would happen, Mike. Some noise about noise."

Mike replies: Yeah, but actual evidence like pictures taken at ISO 3200 –1 with great detail and noise comparable to the D3's don't count. Dpreview's first out of camera JPEGs showed "awful," "horrible" noise at 800, therefore you cannot shoot with the camera above 400. It is said, therefore it is so. Internet wisdom is never wrong.