The White Stripes and Lomography have released special edition Diana and Holga cameras. If you want one hurry, as there were only 3000 made. They are going for $180.00.
_____________________
David Emerick
Featured Comment by David A. Goldfarb: "The White Stripes once recorded a video on our front lawn—okay, it wasn't exactly our front lawn, but it was the grassy oval behind Grant's Tomb that we looked out on from the 20th floor of a nearby high rise apartment building. I didn't know who they were at the time, but it was one of the more unusual things I'd seen from our front window, right up there with a migrating flock of turkey vultures that flew right over our building once. We were going birding that day, so I happened to have my Canon F-1N loaded with color slide film and FD 600mm ƒ/4.5 ready to shoot."
Take that! Leica collectors!
Posted by: Tom V | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 10:56 AM
No thanks. I'm waiting for the Louis Vuitton editions...
Adam
Posted by: mcananeya | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 11:10 AM
Too funny! My cereal almost came out my nose.
The people who will buy these as personal expression of their cultural indedendence, are the same people riding single speed bikes yelling at drivers of Eddie Bauer limited edition jeeps to quit killing the earth!
For the record: I ride a single speed bike and own a Holga.
Great find David
Posted by: charlie d | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 11:12 AM
How come so expensive? These "new editions" sort of defeat the reason for their existence in the first place.
Posted by: Player | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 11:40 AM
If I want a bad camera, I can pick out an old Kodak Duoflex an Ansco (for roll film), or go down to the local Salvation Army store and pick up an all-plastic 35mm for about $2.
Special Ed Diana & Holga: a camera for people with way too much disposable income
Posted by: james | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 12:04 PM
James,
You don't have to buy it to enjoy it.
Mike J.
Posted by: Mike | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 12:15 PM
Now that is a fair deal. Where else will you be able to get 3000 cameras for $180.00? I mean come on! These cameras are easily worth 6 cents each.
Posted by: Claire Senft | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 01:25 PM
Lomography is such a hilarious scam. Reselling a $15 camera (that is made in China for probably $0.32) for $180. Capitalism at its best, huh?
Posted by: switters | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 01:51 PM
You know, I'm going to sound really pathetic, but those Holgas are just what I need. Well, not the bright red Special Ed, version, but the cheap, $25 medium format version.
I'm often photographing from galloping horses, so I need something light and simple that will survive occasionally being bashed into a tree, or hitting the ground at 30mph, sometimes with photographer attached...
Anyways, I don't know if David made the post as a joke (or at least humorous commentary :) but I actually found it helpful. Thanks! :>
Posted by: Eric Schneider | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 01:56 PM
I wonder if the Che Guevara limited edition is already out, I feel a strong urge to manifest my nonconformism.
Posted by: Max | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 02:20 PM
I care for the earth, but I wouldn't shoot with a Holga, nor ride a single speed bike. Actually, I guess I would shoot with a holga BEFORE I rode a single speed bike.
Posted by: Thiago | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 03:01 PM
Eric Schneider,
I don't know what you're thinking of, but a Holga or a Diana will definitely NOT survive being bashed into a tree or hitting the ground at 30 mph. They're made out of fragile plastic and they have all the structural integrity of a juice box. Consider a used Pentax MX....
Mike J.
Posted by: Mike | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 03:55 PM
Thiago said
"I care for the earth, but I wouldn't shoot with a Holga, nor ride a single speed bike. Actually, I guess I would shoot with a holga BEFORE I rode a single speed bike."
How about shooting a single speed Bike while riding a HOLGA?
Posted by: charlie d | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 04:17 PM
A Diana? Are they being made again?
Posted by: milosz | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 06:31 PM
Mike,
I didn't figure it'd survive an impact. But at $25, it doesn't need to. :)
-es
Posted by: Eric Schneider | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 07:41 PM
And these are available from who? Oh yes, the P.T. Barnum sales company.
Posted by: john robison | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 07:44 PM
If you want a decent 'toy' camera that will either survive impact or not make you cry if it doesn't, might I recommend the Agfa Isola. Shutter speeds of 1/30 or 1/100, f/6.3 or f/11, few to no light leaks as a rule.
Figure $10-20 on Ebay, but most of them seem to show up from Scandinavia or Germany, so factor in another $10-15 in shipping.
Posted by: milosz | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 09:35 PM
I've discovered that after taking a look at the cameras, I now have the music loop in my mac. I didn't put it there. Nice. And I'm not sure how to get it out as it's a Mac Pro I've had about a week now. And finally, I think the music is crap.
Posted by: Karl Knize | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 09:51 PM
I'm willing to bet these will be worth more in 50 years time than current model Canon and Nikon DSLRs. (Not that I'll be around to collect.)
Posted by: Stephen Best | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 09:54 PM
Michael,
I rarely disagree with you, but I believe that if Eric really wants a $25 camera that will survive the falls/crashes he describes, he should head to eBay and find himself an Argus C3.
Then again, if he's wearing an Argus C3 around his neck and he falls off the horse, he might not survive if the Argus hits him in the head.
- Craig
Posted by: Craig Cunningham | Friday, 19 October 2007 at 11:25 PM
Lomography actually puts out very cool packaging of very cool cameras that shoot, um, uh, well they shoot film..hey what a concept, sell funky film cameras to kids that grew up on computers. Now THAT'S reverse psychology! And hell yes they're overpriced. Like anything totally cool is overpriced. I have a Lomography 7 element glass fixed lens fish-eye camera and i absolutely love it. There are very few cameras in this world easier, more fun or, yeah, cooler to shoot with. No angst, no uptight artiness, just free-wheeling creativity. That's what Lomography is ALL about. A White Stripes Holga? hahaha, so who said cameras have to be matte black and have the name taped over in electrical tape to have a coolness rating of ten? heh!
Posted by: dyathink | Saturday, 20 October 2007 at 01:30 AM
I remember there was a leica finished in snakeskin. Perhaps a sheepskin trimmed Lomo?
Posted by: The Worst of Perth, ( Lazy Aussie) | Saturday, 20 October 2007 at 07:59 AM
Doesn't this defeat the idea of the whole Toy Camera thing?
Posted by: Steve | Saturday, 20 October 2007 at 09:25 AM
"How about shooting a single speed Bike while riding a HOLGA?"
THAT I can do! :-)
Posted by: Thiago | Saturday, 20 October 2007 at 01:50 PM
Here's what came of this post: I started looking for Argus cameras on ebay, then pointed them out to my girlfriend, who is still weary of my digital ways. She said, "Oh, hold on," and produced an Argus brick from a bag I'd never seen before. I might go ride my single speed bike to the store and get some film for it.
Just kidding. I'll walk. Walking is the new single-speed biking.
Posted by: Chris Norris | Sunday, 21 October 2007 at 11:41 AM
Call it a rip-off if you must, though this seems needlessly harsh...honestly, how much did you spend on ink and paper for that $500 print you're selling? Or are you saying a camera can't have extrinsic value? Quiet, there may be some Leica fans in earshot!
I think this is pretty awesome as a White Stripes fan. Jack & Meg are all about this bizarre baroque nostalgia in red, white and black, and these cameras fit quite nicely into that image. Combine that with the fact that they're also fun cameras and you've got a great gift for the bluespunk hipster on your shopping list.
Posted by: dasmb | Monday, 22 October 2007 at 11:45 AM
It's just not expensive enough. I Might be tempted if they can get canon to do a red 1Ds III, which at these multipliers would be about £25,000... ;)
Posted by: Barry Reid | Monday, 22 October 2007 at 02:17 PM